{"id":"W2788280150","doi":"10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.10.012","title":"Too good to be true? Fallacies in evaluating risk factor models","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Economics","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Spurious relationship; Econometrics; Capital asset pricing model; Identification (biology); Uncorrelated; Inference; Factor analysis; Economics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Asset (computer security); Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1212602,0.001698353,0.003655417,0.00458673,0.002337283,0.01184564,0.004113239,0.005581589,0.003313433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4512575,0.001815029,0.001265204,0.002645822,0.007243643,0.02204694,0.004389614,0.01134306,0.0009294978],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003611096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003420985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003350503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003875735,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9356444,0.04720702,0.003879294,0.002910429,0.009393637,0.0009651593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.593125,0.3573281,0.009980845,0.019553,0.0164603,0.003552688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006369986,0.0003171115,0.01903356,0.0006253142,0.001321895,0.0004222615,0.001317181,0.1905366,0.0003311335,0.5615574,0.03116162,0.192739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004700718,0.00006170556,0.0005695602,0.0002740262,0.00006871206,0.00007844043,0.0002310895,0.1516888,0.0002569697,0.8447934,0.001892548,0.00003771467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1284564,0.02208766,0.7214616,0.09438543,0.003381209,0.0001856575,0.0007209707,0.001321274,0.02799976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8270177,0.003880995,0.1568702,0.006661111,0.002597511,0.0001590081,0.0004837336,0.0004979062,0.00183172],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1212602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6412929,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08195142730558562,"score_gpt":0.2656323041489883,"score_spread":0.1836808768434027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}