{"id":"W2788280150","doi":"10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.10.012","title":"Too good to be true? Fallacies in evaluating risk factor models","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Economics","topic":"Financial Markets and Investment Strategies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Spurious relationship; Econometrics; Capital asset pricing model; Identification (biology); Uncorrelated; Inference; Factor analysis; Economics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Asset (computer security); Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001388183,0.0002419779,0.0007770851,0.0005403538,0.0001459886,0.0001503827,0.0004288167,0.000172249,0.0001824399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000761562,0.0002695214,0.000229159,0.0002572461,0.00009842821,0.0009962163,0.00008568933,0.0003201344,0.0001009711],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003573316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002630437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000227285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005852542,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974698,0.0000317565,0.001673893,0.0003309558,0.00005317829,0.0004404262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980274,0.00008499607,0.001331308,0.0002679645,0.0001328298,0.0001554373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005009875,0.0002402262,0.04467843,0.00003152531,0.00006442172,0.00001161137,0.004974596,0.006205799,0.00006055141,0.9147664,0.003016351,0.02544907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002564726,0.002937472,0.3783716,0.00008695439,0.00002042834,0.00002180367,0.0003411907,0.01344627,0.0002967447,0.5066503,0.09433565,0.000926845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9706913,0.0004763661,0.001170134,0.0009061665,0.001470794,0.0002047202,0.0002366733,0.000009464938,0.02483436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919135,0.0007479937,0.004746236,0.001430518,0.0008467716,0.000007518806,0.00000136916,0.00003134505,0.0002747357],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4081161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999757,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08195142730558562,"score_gpt":0.2656323041489883,"score_spread":0.1836808768434027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}