{"id":"W2789004301","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5020","title":"REDUCING THE “JUSTICE GAP” THROUGH ACCESS TO LEGAL INFORMATION: ESTABLISHING ACCESS TO JUSTICE ENTRY POINTS AT PUBLIC LIBRARIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Economic Justice; Public access; Context (archaeology); Political science; Intermediary; Public relations; Information access; Scope (computer science); Law; Business; Public administration; Sociology; Internet privacy; Library science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005932203,0.0002097179,0.0003449576,0.002668422,0.01304526,0.01594316,0.002964029,0.003718172,0.02106219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02524626,0.0004742569,0.0003659432,0.002190744,0.006838251,0.01518193,0.01962472,0.002731564,0.002220959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005829478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0181762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01175622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03428453,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992727,0.003131424,0.0003128191,0.0004303904,0.001096151,0.002302187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776019,0.0100169,0.002292137,0.00175935,0.003517168,0.004812592],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002746698,0.002285991,0.07322133,0.0005779879,0.00003316021,0.003984976,0.1433133,0.001365018,0.004042981,0.3110177,0.02722749,0.4326555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000208416,0.002138851,0.09816653,0.002117219,0.0001284319,0.002197677,0.3514243,0.005345675,0.009575351,0.1135766,0.414835,0.0002858823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7054065,0.001358193,0.02529539,0.0388274,0.0001972523,0.0006342153,0.00008336916,0.0005636423,0.227634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718769,0.0005544184,0.008167217,0.001405127,0.00008322159,0.0001545748,0.00004313878,0.00004127085,0.01767422],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07046008,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1309670411987433,"score_gpt":0.4069469588281464,"score_spread":0.2759799176294031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}