{"id":"W2789338060","doi":"10.1007/s00267-018-1025-6","title":"The Insignificance of Thresholds in Environmental Impact Assessment: An Illustrative Case Study in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"World Wildlife Fund Canada; University of British Columbia; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Variety (cybernetics); Environmental resource management; Environmental impact assessment; Nature Conservation; Scale (ratio); Baseline (sea); Impact assessment; Insignificance; Environmental planning; Psychology; Environmental science; Political science; Geography; Computer science; Social psychology; Ecology; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006189789,0.0004279355,0.0003596012,0.00007479425,0.0003555246,0.00004216078,0.0005904799,0.00006184947,0.001474581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002556038,0.0003454432,0.00007665043,0.0002949797,0.0007874136,0.0005448597,0.0006936347,0.0003199346,0.00006757757],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006272616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005158245,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5165582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8378396,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964446,0.0003730096,0.0007528274,0.0007017438,0.0009828842,0.0007448898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987695,0.00007072543,0.0002554164,0.000687575,7.618752e-7,0.0002159822],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005841808,0.001639819,0.9798557,0.000003271659,0.00006100334,0.001425702,0.00229276,0.00107731,0.001471928,0.00001166647,0.00006851196,0.01203387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001326922,0.0007995807,0.9397726,0.000009798206,0.00002486713,0.0000473256,0.05653835,0.0006318706,0.000171096,0.00008739014,0.0002404122,0.0003497838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938859,0.00002919514,0.00001331406,0.00003946687,0.0001517405,0.001553748,0.00005442467,0.000009013987,0.004263204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991625,0.00008397744,0.000161112,0.00009038748,0.00003319456,0.0001465488,0.00002181976,0.00003837525,0.0002620798],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3212814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998997,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01186162155887852,"score_gpt":0.2878567599228103,"score_spread":0.2759951383639318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}