{"id":"W2789355936","doi":"10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.2425","title":"Evaluating the spatial ecology of anthrax in North America: examining epidemiological components across multiple geographic scales using a GIS-based approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"CRDF Global","keywords":"Geography; Wildlife; Ecology; Outbreak; Bacillus anthracis; Spatial epidemiology; Range (aeronautics); Disjunct; Environmental niche modelling; Habitat; Biosecurity; Transmission (telecommunications); Ecological niche; Biology; Cartography; Population; Epidemiology; Demography; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008758712,0.0004585865,0.0003756348,0.004251118,0.0003863939,0.001052647,0.0004138606,0.0003159055,0.0007542846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003228469,0.0002777745,0.0005763049,0.003281473,0.0004046805,0.0008109605,0.0008276646,0.0002468449,0.00007667796],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001128863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007599149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03508945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04345492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995219,0.0002108174,0.00003045289,0.00009579672,0.0001035317,0.00003754213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982945,0.0009897617,0.0002968324,0.00008246771,0.0002544917,0.00008195941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001136459,0.0001543889,0.8315023,0.0001109058,0.000340675,0.0002049309,0.0009463575,0.1148,0.001778882,0.001564706,0.0004710448,0.04801214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001922771,0.0001473834,0.5623897,0.00003591894,0.00009741011,0.0001465462,0.005295932,0.4274891,0.0005925074,0.002402321,0.001359594,0.00002430999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911304,0.0001627765,0.006619461,0.0001464601,0.000002861046,0.00004166282,0.0006310984,0.00008696273,0.001178474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816004,0.0001586453,0.01714254,0.00001132547,0.000004354995,0.00004178685,0.0007938355,0.000006569949,0.0002404704],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9649106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06977046,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1556579494509939,"score_gpt":0.4245171695813624,"score_spread":0.2688592201303684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}