{"id":"W2789393060","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0194608","title":"A mathematical model of case-ascertainment bias: Applied to case-control studies nested within a randomized screening trial","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services","keywords":"Observational study; Randomized controlled trial; Randomization; Medicine; Incidence (geometry); Nested case-control study; Cancer screening; Risk factor; Case-control study; Cancer; Internal medicine; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1131286,0.002890158,0.005404159,0.003092825,0.001254917,0.00442281,0.008872273,0.006487781,0.009467036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1890314,0.001788951,0.005263703,0.003316337,0.004404029,0.004026629,0.003238873,0.006825674,0.00153729],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00456067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006384015,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009990685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004011415,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9317966,0.05743888,0.002400056,0.004376402,0.002621661,0.001366338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7784489,0.19753,0.01095989,0.006255776,0.005361177,0.001444257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001128529,0.0001651631,0.006083156,0.001057425,0.001275282,0.001228403,0.0008859025,0.4415386,0.0005630554,0.5188928,0.003777261,0.02340433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001191428,0.0005035529,0.0008739383,0.0003101158,0.0006324305,0.0004899775,0.0001083979,0.754025,0.0003010111,0.236924,0.004557414,0.00008264396],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01069413,0.001775081,0.9761795,0.004619787,0.0004216602,0.001892814,0.001131287,0.0002741012,0.003011744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3458681,0.005384293,0.61166,0.004309031,0.0007904849,0.0169135,0.001719312,0.0001668207,0.01318851],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8868714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5982885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1592936053897143,"score_gpt":0.318744593402494,"score_spread":0.1594509880127797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}