{"id":"W2789449579","doi":"10.1016/j.jes.2018.02.025","title":"Assessing the utility of dissolved organic matter photoreactivity as a predictor of in situ methylmercury concentration","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Sciences","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University; St. Francis Xavier University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Methylmercury; In situ; Environmental chemistry; Environmental science; Organic matter; Dissolved organic carbon; Chemistry; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001258793,0.00009098176,0.0002000692,0.00002868743,0.000128082,0.00002249607,0.0002587249,0.00003155024,0.004704778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008900477,0.00005521458,0.00006520795,0.0002260878,0.002121101,0.0008705387,0.0001045502,0.0001014303,0.00002281843],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008203387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002802553,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008680664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004496818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984932,0.0001529361,0.0004544452,0.0001287954,0.000609619,0.0001610104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990786,0.000156328,0.0005978156,0.000104128,0.000006364571,0.00005681642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011685,0.00008929323,0.5040545,0.000001785463,0.000006342117,5.350017e-7,0.00119667,0.000002198992,0.4936763,0.000001172305,0.0001076181,0.0008518925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001919472,0.0001946657,0.7844371,0.0000198591,0.00001464888,0.00001039049,0.001985905,0.00006635042,0.2127801,0.0001924646,0.00006218869,0.00004438878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938318,0.0000606674,0.00007006124,0.0001766017,0.0001097641,0.0001059481,0.000003620708,0.000001218411,0.005640341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996418,0.00004121546,0.0001787287,0.00008097431,0.0000331974,9.197046e-7,2.806154e-7,0.000002907273,0.00001998379],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2808962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996205,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02394183385738023,"score_gpt":0.3037773759435466,"score_spread":0.2798355420861663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}