{"id":"W2789476126","doi":"10.1111/jomf.12470","title":"Educational Assortative Mating and Income Dynamics in Couples: A Longitudinal Dyadic Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Marriage and the Family","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Assortative mating; Life course approach; Dyad; Psychology; Demographic economics; Perspective (graphical); Educational attainment; Longitudinal data; Inequality; Longitudinal study; Economics; Social psychology; Sociology; Demography; Population; Economic growth","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00293651,0.0001652722,0.0003154649,0.001129108,0.00158315,0.001289643,0.0003782941,0.0003780725,0.002283163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006577983,0.0002388945,0.0005037267,0.00140059,0.0005327889,0.001548809,0.001666647,0.0007050077,0.0002015311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005519915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000589765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01918681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02734629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986283,0.0008631488,0.00005904562,0.0001408219,0.0001139247,0.0001947932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978306,0.0007287988,0.0006642969,0.0002675987,0.0001911865,0.0003175102],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006224615,0.00009002708,0.9859577,0.00001085459,0.0001281323,0.0000900525,0.004131179,0.0002035691,0.0001772019,0.0009950816,0.0001880788,0.007965958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004949784,0.0001312832,0.9849979,0.00003970853,0.00008222746,0.0001743743,0.01018741,0.00169769,0.0001152758,0.001701431,0.0008513643,0.00001621766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974416,0.0004588465,0.0007407879,0.0002985439,0.000009024612,0.000009723645,0.0001810108,0.000004099951,0.0008563731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991159,0.0002323403,0.0002579496,0.00002918855,0.00000605693,0.00001351099,0.0001349771,0.000001344284,0.0002086829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01918681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03815025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01702659319438983,"score_gpt":0.3157165167668905,"score_spread":0.2986899235725007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}