{"id":"W2789928653","doi":"10.1177/1097184x17753038","title":"The Foreskin Aesthetic or Ugliness Reconsidered","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Men and Masculinities","topic":"Genital Health and Disease","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Foreskin; Argument (complex analysis); Aesthetics; Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Reading (process); Sociology; History; Art; Law; Political science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001472081,0.00007525397,0.0001132132,0.00002342638,0.0002738097,0.00002816456,0.00003299861,0.00003266365,0.0001579321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001146875,0.00003861618,0.00003370165,0.00004153051,0.0002621186,0.00003028886,0.00002124695,0.00005264104,0.00007180456],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001101467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002087282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003897601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001095091,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994401,0.00002615611,0.0001414352,0.000103698,0.00009337983,0.0001951747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994783,0.00007324175,0.00002375731,0.0001625561,0.00008189009,0.000180259],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0251355,0.0005664972,0.01626142,0.002769457,0.0001861171,0.0009011214,0.04554701,5.548561e-7,0.0001187735,0.02334255,0.2634619,0.6217091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0167447,0.006419604,0.04133906,0.000355346,0.0006364484,0.002926259,0.106443,0.001560701,0.002048301,0.04865823,0.7719409,0.0009273806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9111826,0.002438453,0.00001081049,0.005620493,0.0002487593,0.0003826093,0.000007658136,0.0000630735,0.08004559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980062,0.0002177506,0.0001380773,0.001281977,0.0002377667,0.00002981182,0.000004498942,0.000008819743,0.01801927],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6207818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.210595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0373085509287141,"score_gpt":0.3188435393153657,"score_spread":0.2815349883866516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}