{"id":"W2790082450","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2017-0404","title":"Meta optimization of stand management with population-based methods","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Thinning; Particle swarm optimization; Population; Differential evolution; Mathematical optimization; Schedule; Metaheuristic; Computer science; Forest management; Population size; Mathematics; Geography; Forestry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001949121,0.00007943367,0.0001585039,0.0004951942,0.0001816577,0.00004971125,0.0003575054,0.00003197161,0.005327705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005757137,0.00005786826,0.00005860128,0.0007683397,0.0004112526,0.000182247,0.00003168909,0.0001324348,0.00003809584],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002361015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001641569,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02084163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05942412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986029,0.0002005265,0.0002456943,0.0001118456,0.0005042138,0.0003348555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991304,0.00007288892,0.0001270509,0.0002138693,0.0001183085,0.0003374518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001334317,0.00003744401,0.7065922,0.00006317877,0.0004860006,0.00008013123,0.00032308,0.2649221,0.00001193513,0.004852437,0.01606701,0.006431069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001779181,0.002369187,0.8715894,0.0001481559,0.000664749,0.00002290133,0.0001608945,0.03074326,0.0005148439,0.003253911,0.08835325,0.0004002607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7140594,0.0004649785,0.07858618,0.002786588,0.0003720508,0.001190173,0.00002825527,0.00001323002,0.2024992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9256787,0.000008771357,0.07179872,0.00004604739,0.00006262174,0.000004368585,0.000004199633,0.00001404086,0.002382572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2341788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955816,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08008250986527192,"score_gpt":0.3713121041316328,"score_spread":0.2912295942663609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}