{"id":"W2790255949","doi":"10.1155/2018/2637075","title":"Quality Risk Evaluation of the Food Supply Chain Using a Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model and Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Food Quality","topic":"Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis; Risk analysis (engineering); Quality (philosophy); Supply chain; Food supply; Ranking (information retrieval); Computer science; Failure mode and effects analysis; Fuzzy logic; Supply chain risk management; Criticality; Food safety; Food quality; Guideline; Reliability engineering; Food chain; Order (exchange); Supply chain management; Business; Engineering; Marketing; Environmental science; Service management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009237036,0.0001572755,0.0005145248,0.00004410832,0.0003231091,0.00005262819,0.000153554,0.0001322558,0.00001600056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002253101,0.00006363425,0.0002891379,0.0006264076,0.0004169666,0.0002352705,0.00008765502,0.0002351621,6.084152e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001534249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001099274,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002911471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001531676,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928184,0.004646036,0.0008370806,0.0002749024,0.001234672,0.0001889589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950936,0.0005673327,0.0008386493,0.0001515006,0.003217781,0.0001311426],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001686691,0.001983672,0.3518638,0.0009084333,0.00388294,5.01948e-7,0.008045628,0.02500484,0.2642795,0.009557529,0.000111922,0.3326745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007576724,0.0008667796,0.8538306,0.00002705363,0.001292877,0.000007578024,0.006682001,0.08211387,0.002140852,0.05212324,0.000005416538,0.0001520965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975009,0.000486648,0.0002415495,0.001074033,0.00008341004,0.0004764807,0.00009844283,0.000005897356,0.00003262198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994313,0.00001679666,0.0003591003,0.00005756089,0.0001248401,0.000004144143,0.000004101804,0.000001001169,0.000001211071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5019668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3201391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0902709851008169,"score_gpt":0.3698592494186562,"score_spread":0.2795882643178393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}