{"id":"W2790364471","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwy008.064","title":"A63 COLONOSCOPY QUALITY IN COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING: HOW BEST TO CAPTURE THE DATA?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","topic":"Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Alberta Health Services","funders":"","keywords":"Colonoscopy; Data collection; Medicine; Audit; Data quality; Quality (philosophy); Automatic identification and data capture; Colorectal cancer; Medical physics; Quality management; Medical emergency; Computer science; Operations management; Cancer; Management system; Internal medicine; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2330626,0.001463085,0.003837413,0.008621834,0.00401839,0.01865525,0.005423244,0.004455764,0.002817083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4451328,0.001980542,0.003301269,0.01789036,0.006862114,0.02190171,0.009088776,0.008947344,0.001317556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01693508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04823312,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1247036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1300687,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7730188,0.1457973,0.0317332,0.006190218,0.03918077,0.00407966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5240356,0.2385659,0.06303474,0.03147868,0.1250381,0.01784698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004826523,0.0007219569,0.2440414,0.01127749,0.001184303,0.0002350019,0.01331869,0.002142967,0.0006457924,0.007093027,0.05167027,0.6671865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008684798,0.006002077,0.6432541,0.08142333,0.002503999,0.00130573,0.05874046,0.02196761,0.003045145,0.03489529,0.1445712,0.001422509],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1326128,0.07201381,0.101339,0.6562963,0.004891369,0.007128221,0.004733773,0.001617848,0.01936694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5296409,0.04037691,0.3831185,0.03281811,0.001858982,0.007363018,0.002626207,0.0003932292,0.001804135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2330626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9457704,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03631471444411059,"score_gpt":0.3285240969188466,"score_spread":0.292209382474736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}