{"id":"W2790419111","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cpx056","title":"Assessing the greenhouse gas effects of harvested wood products manufactured from managed forests in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Forest Research Institute; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Environmental science; Life-cycle assessment; Carbon fibers; Sustainability; Engineering; Environmental engineering; Waste management; Forestry; Production (economics); Geography; Ecology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003284327,0.0004094572,0.0001946789,0.0007581785,0.001019477,0.0008635194,0.0006324563,0.0001694959,0.0007229839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003730219,0.0001773505,0.0004248633,0.001504167,0.0003914204,0.0002794357,0.000278349,0.0001825087,0.00006238988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03599916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02111749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997457,0.00001808996,0.000007581486,0.00003647678,0.0001246907,0.00006750026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976,0.00002829774,0.00002639685,0.000008902047,0.0001510766,0.00002532523],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006557203,0.0002629005,0.5555654,0.0004552143,0.0004582564,0.000729587,0.0006946597,0.3175933,0.03606212,0.004051947,0.002064913,0.08140591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007135746,0.0002626007,0.7327943,0.00007747138,0.000328956,0.0001199536,0.00154338,0.2254471,0.02422863,0.00119934,0.01382101,0.0001058998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905611,0.0004020508,0.001706196,0.00006677243,0.000002582972,0.0000642616,0.002426549,0.00004108257,0.004729514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938138,0.0003379815,0.003067282,0.00002155282,7.501376e-7,0.00001862611,0.001298639,0.000009775781,0.001431623],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03599916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2611934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03007683721928651,"score_gpt":0.3498464316213888,"score_spread":0.3197695944021023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}