{"id":"W2790419111","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cpx056","title":"Assessing the greenhouse gas effects of harvested wood products manufactured from managed forests in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Forest Research Institute; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Natural Resources Canada","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Environmental science; Life-cycle assessment; Carbon fibers; Sustainability; Engineering; Environmental engineering; Waste management; Forestry; Production (economics); Geography; Ecology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001370161,0.0001535686,0.0002272474,0.0001066493,0.000295288,0.0003230417,0.002294617,0.00006678794,0.0001507734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001555419,0.0001066149,0.0000714815,0.0001055214,0.0006196196,0.002038311,0.0005619565,0.0007359708,0.000005439203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001386258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004016379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6096928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7735299,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966757,0.0003664527,0.0004896424,0.0002481512,0.001813683,0.0004063734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981673,0.0003770394,0.0004811428,0.0006863692,0.0001101413,0.0001780313],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001556897,0.0002137298,0.9913232,0.00002155931,0.00004705163,0.0005460004,0.0002917435,0.001968488,0.0006852909,0.00004664556,0.0002079189,0.004492664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007930368,0.0001721591,0.9843814,0.0001048045,0.000008935169,0.0000275598,0.0004612296,0.000431801,0.008231034,0.005079254,0.0002112788,0.00009744933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977507,0.0000292547,0.00003397651,0.001049874,0.0003557226,0.0003076583,0.00001054955,0.000002551718,0.0004596897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993738,0.00003087267,0.0002518742,0.00002471155,0.0001667029,0.000007642418,0.000009204941,0.00001648611,0.0001187023],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1638372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4347629,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03007683721928651,"score_gpt":0.3498464316213888,"score_spread":0.3197695944021023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}