{"id":"W2790517002","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.2124","title":"Evaluation of invasive and non‐invasive methods to monitor rodent abundance in the Arctic","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecosphere","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université Laval; Canadian Museum of Nature","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada; Polar Knowledge Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Mark and recapture; Burrow; Transect; Quadrat; Ecology; Arctic; Environmental science; Biology; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00119278,0.00006890099,0.0001000501,0.000006490357,0.00009958133,0.000006317334,0.0001314951,0.00003661083,0.001552734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003124406,0.00004910695,0.00001667595,0.0001353045,0.0002123111,0.00006952232,0.0001182323,0.00006121787,0.0002779272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001000906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001382579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004631859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02010817,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991642,0.0002124996,0.0001184697,0.0001754554,0.0002072447,0.0001221565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995986,0.0001674147,0.00005244506,0.0001228483,0.00003539692,0.00002335097],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004211122,0.0001724369,0.9093532,0.00001529822,0.0000243491,0.000003210637,0.01305765,0.0002053732,0.01723846,0.00003128435,0.004589545,0.05526706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016435,0.0002533287,0.9893565,0.00001566337,0.00004428938,0.000001922426,0.001808334,0.0001199685,0.007431121,0.0006583138,0.00008652874,0.00005966248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924998,0.000114201,0.00006974298,0.0002749349,0.00008381364,0.0003228684,0.000001157257,0.00000285072,0.006630585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948714,0.00002262007,0.004751062,0.0001569981,0.00002758007,0.00006815601,2.43708e-7,0.00000349503,0.00009843104],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0800033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03729499770762762,"score_gpt":0.3512927199818977,"score_spread":0.3139977222742701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}