{"id":"W2790780638","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.044","title":"Flood-related risks in Ho Chi Minh City and ways of mitigation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Megacity; Flooding (psychology); Flood myth; Geography; Population; Ho chi minh; Environmental planning; Redevelopment; Environmental protection; Socioeconomics; Cartography; Civil engineering; Environmental health; Engineering; Economy; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004112313,0.00005786436,0.0001498307,0.00007782281,0.00002730689,0.000004058962,0.0001028996,0.00006656475,0.0004531511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001988757,0.00004693296,0.00002981345,0.0001076268,0.0002216547,0.0001313169,0.00007652636,0.0001470509,0.00001781664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003171452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005348807,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001965606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002420341,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992961,0.00005406248,0.000305087,0.00008609346,0.0001347536,0.0001238635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996166,0.00002248224,0.0002485397,0.00006968849,0.000008488571,0.00003420351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007975489,0.0001804746,0.9717063,0.00000820456,0.00006121601,0.00005662992,0.0007914169,0.0009391691,0.01649686,0.0004259,0.004181801,0.005072264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001151769,0.0009419265,0.9787956,0.00001237121,0.00004278684,0.00005343993,0.00003812591,0.004620482,0.003699451,0.007114185,0.00345229,0.0000775117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924875,0.00004540422,0.0001584572,0.00219574,0.0001075755,0.00005992016,3.78488e-7,0.000002448218,0.004942584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984498,0.00006329185,0.0009783451,0.0004273833,0.00003669264,5.948711e-7,4.368028e-7,0.000003270048,0.00004016448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01279741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4961687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01985460108591646,"score_gpt":0.2606496321796957,"score_spread":0.2407950310937792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}