{"id":"W2790780638","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.044","title":"Flood-related risks in Ho Chi Minh City and ways of mitigation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Megacity; Flooding (psychology); Flood myth; Geography; Population; Ho chi minh; Environmental planning; Redevelopment; Environmental protection; Socioeconomics; Cartography; Civil engineering; Environmental health; Engineering; Economy; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001955837,0.0002314535,0.0001600335,0.0008670883,0.00141235,0.0007562216,0.0004531957,0.0005238481,0.001557378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004272637,0.0003446089,0.0004120666,0.001408716,0.0007151844,0.0006213176,0.00104077,0.0007057044,0.00009539717],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002398023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003237442,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1719645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3946258,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997888,0.00004145184,0.00002197656,0.00002203856,0.00002554629,0.0001002361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995279,0.00004043563,0.0001663908,0.00001117978,0.00007218812,0.0001819613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005982661,0.00008574974,0.9895835,0.00005200831,0.00007691258,0.0008164031,0.003184554,0.0001836635,0.0004410196,0.0004216156,0.0006179136,0.004476832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005228737,0.00003957032,0.9812962,0.0000349721,0.00004038011,0.0002437951,0.01655013,0.0003308284,0.0000610128,0.0001929765,0.001189262,0.00001566826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972827,0.0003115134,0.00003538678,0.0009775704,0.00001304124,0.000009943741,0.0002553396,0.000002822487,0.001111661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989128,0.0002627829,0.00005117062,0.00007666719,0.00001107605,0.000008581042,0.0001367523,0.000001284736,0.0005389935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1719645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3419271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01985460108591646,"score_gpt":0.2606496321796957,"score_spread":0.2407950310937792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}