{"id":"W2790950295","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i2.5043","title":"LAWYER COMPETENCIES FOR ACCESS TO JUSTICE: TWO EMPIRICAL STUDIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Thompson Rivers University; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Framing (construction); Economic Justice; Sociology; Critical reflection; Legal profession; Social justice; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Law; Pedagogy; Law and economics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03916473,0.0006935393,0.0009107878,0.006385957,0.007722903,0.006823596,0.003451384,0.003914908,0.01299637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1680814,0.001179373,0.0006735714,0.007546476,0.01019954,0.01172003,0.01163082,0.008563434,0.0009837445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008795211,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02176001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03903176,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9763094,0.01400185,0.001773131,0.001875104,0.003839375,0.002201159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5940801,0.3445902,0.0300646,0.01034752,0.01449473,0.006422838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005520191,0.01331558,0.2815631,0.00242116,0.0001925585,0.001466681,0.6192675,0.0001561972,0.0004298387,0.02318473,0.006946719,0.05050392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002562507,0.0006513693,0.3366137,0.003931127,0.0002253319,0.0009607436,0.6330764,0.0004418529,0.0004926986,0.003857455,0.01940262,0.00009041672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800008,0.003140271,0.0006433878,0.00253494,0.00003925664,0.0005164073,0.0002566021,0.000009852572,0.01285853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930639,0.001991465,0.000855941,0.001249697,0.00004867848,0.0008779772,0.0003152244,0.00001840057,0.001578737],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.97824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2071253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3443472837809,"score_gpt":0.5682591560974322,"score_spread":0.2239118723165322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}