{"id":"W2791092751","doi":"10.1080/14488353.2018.1444333","title":"Condition assessment model for sewer pipelines using fuzzy-based evidential reasoning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Water Systems and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Qatar National Research Fund","keywords":"Evidential reasoning approach; Pipeline transport; Engineering; Project commissioning; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Publishing; Civil engineering; Forensic engineering; Artificial intelligence; Decision support system; Environmental engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003229359,0.0001705612,0.0002386478,0.0002135186,0.00005494473,0.00008716944,0.000116558,0.00008591242,0.00002437783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003631747,0.0001708415,0.0001245398,0.0001213659,0.00001419979,0.0004346253,0.000006946137,0.0001385352,0.000001294568],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001282077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000586337,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003273102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006138444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989439,0.00001027468,0.0005015884,0.00009377498,0.0001961651,0.0002543119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993505,0.00002794892,0.0001365784,0.0001064859,0.0002752141,0.0001032673],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007168377,0.000006593654,0.0001190662,0.000136573,0.00004926241,0.00000393865,0.0001100545,0.9879534,0.009277147,0.00005853215,0.002248971,0.00002927185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005720184,0.00006573947,0.0002043083,0.0005522724,0.00006864727,0.0000392114,0.00001878132,0.9923006,0.005516332,0.00003293453,0.000444151,0.0001850136],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05978718,0.00004273684,0.9385412,0.0000305299,0.00131146,0.0001185,0.000009972969,0.00006738018,0.00009106201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9366348,0.000003718539,0.06212143,0.000007713217,0.001057064,0.00000430103,0.000007049505,0.0000509057,0.0001129821],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8768477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6966713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02829865822963799,"score_gpt":0.2829821315043384,"score_spread":0.2546834732747004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}