{"id":"W2791092751","doi":"10.1080/14488353.2018.1444333","title":"Condition assessment model for sewer pipelines using fuzzy-based evidential reasoning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Water Systems and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Qatar National Research Fund","keywords":"Evidential reasoning approach; Pipeline transport; Engineering; Project commissioning; Fuzzy logic; Computer science; Publishing; Civil engineering; Forensic engineering; Artificial intelligence; Decision support system; Environmental engineering; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002342267,0.001205047,0.001198622,0.001323708,0.0007572146,0.001869052,0.001693729,0.00202163,0.002137002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003961503,0.0006724918,0.001445454,0.000688531,0.001137716,0.00188429,0.0009111788,0.001532562,0.0002931427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002320082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001777023,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01936976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01006794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990396,0.0002730067,0.00005384944,0.0002471635,0.0002840299,0.0001023165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998229,0.001102162,0.0002459738,0.00003804498,0.0003396732,0.00004522708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000141831,0.00001067375,0.0001841793,0.0000170113,0.000009933187,0.00003714695,0.00004107203,0.9944767,0.0003872618,0.00256415,0.00004435637,0.002213349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024869,0.000009137435,0.00005624965,0.000002044726,0.000004322463,0.000005351394,0.000004012621,0.9989169,0.00007912381,0.000876323,0.00004064048,0.000003425627],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03392709,0.0001220838,0.9623215,0.000159018,0.00001907109,0.00008247836,0.00008520036,0.0001679292,0.003115659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9455085,0.0001887124,0.05069083,0.00003643702,0.00001928953,0.0002546053,0.0001023878,0.00001665704,0.003182542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01936976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03851402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02829865822963799,"score_gpt":0.2829821315043384,"score_spread":0.2546834732747004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}