{"id":"W2791242887","doi":"10.1002/pds.4401","title":"Measuring the impact of pharmacoepidemiologic research using altmetrics: A case study of a<scp>CNODES</scp>drug‐safety article","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; University of Waterloo; University of British Columbia; Toronto Metropolitan University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Dalhousie University; Diabetes Canada","keywords":"Medicine; Altmetrics; Pharmacoepidemiology; Drug; Drug approval; Oncology; Pharmacology; Data science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1918714,0.0009073919,0.001661868,0.04256361,0.003627916,0.01072069,0.002776253,0.002259218,0.002408539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3561832,0.0005932559,0.001922532,0.05717996,0.004113208,0.009174055,0.005622998,0.002304086,0.0004182013],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01317035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01930652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01050093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02342076,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8127411,0.1093954,0.02870515,0.003645283,0.04370434,0.001808742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3603441,0.5158148,0.04332344,0.01253966,0.06504465,0.002933387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004304078,0.0003960552,0.1116568,0.06045489,0.001634509,0.006422302,0.07999169,0.002307443,0.001811149,0.04722378,0.02461109,0.66306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002356738,0.001722348,0.1776626,0.1084534,0.004629996,0.01141517,0.1337088,0.01057998,0.008343826,0.06050655,0.482106,0.0006357271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.4229738,0.2548598,0.09351283,0.0966519,0.002307606,0.005813003,0.008845353,0.0008219841,0.1142137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7917994,0.0659823,0.1297424,0.004901663,0.0008885394,0.002714287,0.001804072,0.000240458,0.001926807],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9574364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965664,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9081095872473246,"score_gpt":0.6674752641667971,"score_spread":0.2406343230805275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}