{"id":"W2791256159","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11352","title":"Goodness‐of‐fit tests for Lévy‐driven Ornstein‐Uhlenbeck processes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process; Goodness of fit; Lévy process; Mathematics; Econometrics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Volatility (finance); Stochastic process; Process (computing); Statistical physics; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0426257,0.001432398,0.00254813,0.005331813,0.001354743,0.003408238,0.003692092,0.004115372,0.00521341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2271846,0.0006514215,0.003223664,0.002937427,0.00425332,0.00478484,0.00287855,0.003085782,0.0008431407],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001612615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001573926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00292108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001636998,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9744732,0.01662105,0.001708994,0.003047871,0.003022729,0.001126139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5887421,0.3713015,0.01266216,0.01390574,0.008285675,0.005102819],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004443457,0.0009689768,0.3208177,0.0005345282,0.004266463,0.001299626,0.0009576865,0.5014645,0.002397666,0.0805104,0.00496597,0.07737311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002534823,0.001113072,0.04881386,0.00009081156,0.000203598,0.0004028653,0.0004431514,0.891992,0.001699632,0.05380495,0.001009137,0.0001735556],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8151042,0.000717541,0.179069,0.0007499412,0.0002028762,0.0001791924,0.0009528119,0.0006680593,0.002356308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888909,0.00005655611,0.009810787,0.00005996038,0.00003846749,0.00008795996,0.0007239714,0.00005335764,0.0002781473],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0426257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2254289,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09529080027064349,"score_gpt":0.2628576981862122,"score_spread":0.1675668979155687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}