{"id":"W2791256159","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11352","title":"Goodness‐of‐fit tests for Lévy‐driven Ornstein‐Uhlenbeck processes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process; Goodness of fit; Lévy process; Mathematics; Econometrics; Statistical hypothesis testing; Volatility (finance); Stochastic process; Process (computing); Statistical physics; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Computer science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000346473,0.0001086606,0.0003815339,0.0002854489,0.0001350727,0.00004482401,0.0002434624,0.00008003001,0.0001290296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001934219,0.000123268,0.00006076831,0.000211846,0.0001504829,0.0001576221,0.000007874065,0.0001113229,0.00002513183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001068858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001056907,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002480039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02934172,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987326,0.000005672926,0.0008011702,0.0001385804,0.00003832388,0.0002837034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980385,0.0001446908,0.0006540259,0.0001385866,0.0007433736,0.0002808652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001581696,0.0001299559,0.388815,0.001157585,0.0002242883,0.00006443602,0.006061682,0.0008291748,0.00004660531,0.5306335,0.04700868,0.02487093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002741679,0.002815757,0.07561687,0.0006035679,0.0001166746,0.00007162706,0.0006443558,0.02810583,0.0005634706,0.4973706,0.3902942,0.001055359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3576149,0.003878523,0.6262506,0.000362455,0.001784665,0.0003316997,0.007223073,0.000007379809,0.002546668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9597092,0.0001032482,0.03954725,0.00007391768,0.0003601848,0.000002303148,0.000008383637,0.00002168253,0.0001738867],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6020942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9883702,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09529080027064349,"score_gpt":0.2628576981862122,"score_spread":0.1675668979155687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}