{"id":"W2791271632","doi":"10.1007/s10646-018-1918-4","title":"Evidence of citation bias in the pesticide ecotoxicology literature","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecotoxicology","topic":"Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Ecotoxicology; Impact factor; Pesticide; Publication bias; Citation; Environmental health; Toxicology; Psychology; Meta-analysis; Biology; Medicine; Ecology; Library science; Internal medicine; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1894578,0.0008866646,0.002481151,0.06707194,0.003002219,0.01515662,0.004672495,0.004852697,0.01794385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6554216,0.0007708538,0.00175821,0.06980563,0.007800289,0.008266018,0.006526505,0.002064214,0.001766983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00559939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009420769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008126961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008806009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7813675,0.08192479,0.06292803,0.01581782,0.05399972,0.003962115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08358213,0.7323933,0.092028,0.02449091,0.06438082,0.003124961],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002719708,0.0003020164,0.4677366,0.06653953,0.009386823,0.002375541,0.0280565,0.0009750575,0.001607217,0.06485888,0.04916303,0.3062792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009921218,0.0005570528,0.4645879,0.06914882,0.01330436,0.006980515,0.02110408,0.001432631,0.004932719,0.1153198,0.3012704,0.0003695569],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1879545,0.5982036,0.006380459,0.1074818,0.007300845,0.0004949725,0.01133614,0.000174936,0.08067271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8366345,0.1208725,0.004177806,0.01846941,0.01011507,0.0003466665,0.004884592,0.0002043671,0.00429505],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9329281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06344332746061673,"score_gpt":0.3010187265565705,"score_spread":0.2375753990959537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}