{"id":"W2791496770","doi":"10.1142/s2010007818400092","title":"REVENUE RECYCLING AND COST EFFECTIVE GHG ABATEMENT: AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS USING A GLOBAL MULTI-SECTOR MULTI-REGION CGE MODEL","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Climate Change Economics","topic":"Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Computable general equilibrium; Carbon tax; Economics; Subsidy; Revenue; Investment (military); Tax revenue; Greenhouse gas; Welfare; Lump sum; Natural resource economics; Public economics; Macroeconomics; Finance; Market economy; Payment","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006967799,0.0003798644,0.0008494083,0.0003903639,0.0003703437,0.0001798303,0.0002759487,0.0002582188,0.00002660218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004652731,0.000498713,0.000221592,0.0002947497,0.0002216666,0.001167849,0.0002185577,0.0001591689,0.0001824805],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006910934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001665127,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003498833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002348044,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974009,0.00004546839,0.0008431766,0.0009910356,0.00001628752,0.0007031687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984043,0.00003701281,0.0006756873,0.000552159,0.00003967088,0.0002912165],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003374926,0.0007181962,0.9297289,0.0003007979,0.001301895,0.00001355996,0.0143742,0.003666509,0.00005451894,0.04336317,0.0001163095,0.00602443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001522199,0.0001099024,0.04318165,0.00003149565,0.0001237846,0.000006346093,0.0003094569,0.9456871,0.00004776049,0.008029846,0.0003128077,0.0006376429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849609,0.0005064131,0.009593346,0.00008663883,0.0005553083,0.0009274115,0.002383066,0.00006258228,0.0009243556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994284,0.0006072833,0.003396167,0.0006105648,0.0007047027,0.0002254886,0.00008847612,0.00006601497,0.00001734589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9420206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997464,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2452035700432265,"score_gpt":0.319260645581469,"score_spread":0.07405707553824248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}