{"id":"W2791504532","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.09.035","title":"Wang-Koch formula for optimization of intraocular lens power calculation: Evaluation at a Canadian center","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","topic":"Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Prism Eye Institute; Cegep de Sept Iles; Trillium Health Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Dioptre; Intraocular lens; Ophthalmology; Phacoemulsification; Mean squared prediction error; Mean absolute error; Mathematics; Nuclear medicine; Surgery; Visual acuity; Statistics; Mean squared error","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001317293,0.000129297,0.000451161,0.0003836839,0.000161253,0.000007180172,0.00004062327,0.0001224381,0.0003919808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001002154,0.0001034474,0.0002620637,0.0001559368,0.0001039043,0.0004502868,0.00001427808,0.0001384054,0.000007699984],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004815429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006165637,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004315479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002363271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986261,0.00009643396,0.0005569066,0.0001257113,0.000364357,0.0002305072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965497,0.0003323674,0.0006681647,0.0001337573,0.002174828,0.0001411418],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01182983,0.00203052,0.9277986,0.0003033979,0.003003307,0.000216695,0.003085156,0.0008768909,0.005731798,0.0000761178,0.03912722,0.005920457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003364443,0.00416462,0.9591677,0.0005876563,0.0009993906,0.001369705,0.0004042099,0.002719583,0.009170935,0.0001177285,0.01763481,0.0002992437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947426,0.0002835939,0.001308909,0.001646497,0.000680454,0.000413488,0.00002889086,0.00000371895,0.0008917995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983791,0.00006285217,0.0006413115,0.0003515842,0.0003075789,0.000007864567,0.00009558137,0.00001575462,0.0001384193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03136906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4291915,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05525261478581392,"score_gpt":0.3744729767116151,"score_spread":0.3192203619258012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}