{"id":"W2791504532","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.09.035","title":"Wang-Koch formula for optimization of intraocular lens power calculation: Evaluation at a Canadian center","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","topic":"Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Prism Eye Institute; Cegep de Sept Iles; Trillium Health Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Dioptre; Intraocular lens; Ophthalmology; Phacoemulsification; Mean squared prediction error; Mean absolute error; Mathematics; Nuclear medicine; Surgery; Visual acuity; Statistics; Mean squared error","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01200669,0.0007005175,0.0006437902,0.001705403,0.0008735757,0.0009872816,0.001737677,0.0005487294,0.001901617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0467162,0.0003651089,0.0006366616,0.001883869,0.000577568,0.0008149143,0.001011142,0.000507827,0.000372493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006135856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01078585,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2221343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2822535,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9923152,0.001806669,0.0005552648,0.0006468924,0.004457755,0.0002182588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719194,0.006754532,0.003523706,0.001621553,0.01533721,0.0008435648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002249987,0.000254412,0.7611609,0.0003382338,0.0002820479,0.0002562326,0.0009305419,0.004181548,0.002994399,0.0006724806,0.002789328,0.2238899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003624078,0.001843395,0.9303268,0.0002546117,0.000470023,0.001731034,0.0005917936,0.05263508,0.005301519,0.0002442765,0.006065702,0.0001734474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9740327,0.002765222,0.01480745,0.0004034448,0.00008640468,0.0005612022,0.0006603264,0.0002683006,0.006414997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969637,0.0009294404,0.02756164,0.00007959282,0.00002291759,0.0001917193,0.0005129566,0.00009455723,0.0009702598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2221343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4416826,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05525261478581392,"score_gpt":0.3744729767116151,"score_spread":0.3192203619258012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}