{"id":"W2791532714","doi":"10.1111/cag.12439","title":"Visual convincing of intangible cultural relationships using maps: A case study of the Tongariro National Park World Heritage nomination dossier","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes","topic":"Geographic Information Systems Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Nomination; National park; World heritage; Cultural heritage; Cultural property; Intangible cultural heritage; Geography; Government (linguistics); Industrial heritage; Political science; Cultural heritage management; Archaeology; Law; Tourism","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002970646,0.0004982136,0.0002751068,0.001776028,0.009768347,0.004083157,0.001640542,0.001335862,0.004500451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005229219,0.0004775075,0.0003156297,0.003525931,0.007728236,0.003056301,0.004589936,0.001774325,0.0002296974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006126331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003720954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1100475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.355514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974031,0.001833458,0.00006096158,0.0001341216,0.000266004,0.0003023641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996885,0.001848757,0.0003239025,0.0002802862,0.0002317866,0.0004302784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000231542,0.00006803471,0.010022,0.0001212474,0.000007996226,0.01004318,0.9642435,0.0001778688,0.0005160886,0.004219224,0.001262697,0.009295076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002631284,0.00002447399,0.01079483,0.000103473,0.000007672244,0.001195621,0.9618569,0.0002118871,0.0002033792,0.0005130646,0.02507093,0.00001505389],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.980373,0.0003488998,0.001128707,0.001657019,0.00002343293,0.00008825615,0.0001040812,0.00001380084,0.01626281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925337,0.0005349629,0.001953939,0.000119562,0.000008735781,0.00004882167,0.0000499989,0.00001903327,0.004731244],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8899525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.218814,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0399221551927688,"score_gpt":0.2880397459610258,"score_spread":0.248117590768257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}