{"id":"W2791532714","doi":"10.1111/cag.12439","title":"Visual convincing of intangible cultural relationships using maps: A case study of the Tongariro National Park World Heritage nomination dossier","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes","topic":"Geographic Information Systems Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Nomination; National park; World heritage; Cultural heritage; Cultural property; Intangible cultural heritage; Geography; Government (linguistics); Industrial heritage; Political science; Cultural heritage management; Archaeology; Law; Tourism","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001564759,0.0002879555,0.0004123755,0.003918368,0.003830003,0.0001223218,0.0004617889,0.0001552873,0.00006357203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005686334,0.0002542947,0.0002592402,0.01141309,0.003786887,0.0007003064,0.00008683392,0.0002581048,0.000001465712],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002964088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005593748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9004273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9991391,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968624,0.0004164639,0.0009004437,0.0003299834,0.0007450979,0.0007456022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963137,0.0003131937,0.0006435946,0.0003351546,0.002014082,0.0003802967],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000136226,0.00006280052,0.831018,0.00004452009,0.0003091101,0.00003372387,0.1523066,0.00003974491,0.00001798802,0.01451721,0.001272083,0.0003645878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005239442,0.000135867,0.1704095,0.0001181145,0.00011889,0.00009689095,0.8193231,0.0000767428,0.00002098011,0.0006393105,0.008153087,0.0003835913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892256,0.0002462285,0.000002147387,0.000276527,0.0009135075,0.000993496,0.0001250376,0.0000400504,0.008177467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992114,0.00003095947,0.0001123689,0.00007401354,0.0002159663,0.0000601004,0.00001122844,0.0000199207,0.0002640612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6670164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999909,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0399221551927688,"score_gpt":0.2880397459610258,"score_spread":0.248117590768257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}