{"id":"W2791921213","doi":"10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.03.015","title":"Realistic risk assessment of arsenic in rice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Food Chemistry","topic":"Arsenic contamination and mitigation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Arsenic; Inorganic arsenic; Environmental chemistry; Arsenic toxicity; Chemistry; Genetic algorithm; Gastrointestinal tract; Contamination; Toxicology; Food science; Biology; Ecology; Biochemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001186593,0.00004786973,0.00005900482,0.000006309536,0.00002472174,0.000003195507,0.00008275425,0.00003793297,0.001517461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005130026,0.00004951814,0.00001879816,0.0001065639,0.0001005384,0.00004030212,0.00005142187,0.00006398953,0.0000306975],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009996785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001268923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008472896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001054653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995099,0.0000133694,0.0001341801,0.0001267111,0.0001304442,0.00008545157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997109,0.00002168589,0.00008647568,0.0001428223,0.000007924335,0.00003016435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001096716,0.0002023827,0.08100112,0.00004704469,0.00001503828,0.000002627688,0.0007211652,0.00008035571,0.9008577,0.0001736222,0.001845849,0.01504211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006631343,0.0001168487,0.4816595,0.00002754841,0.00001826949,0.000004816558,0.0002902182,0.004880575,0.507841,0.001155716,0.003163127,0.000179258],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8685846,0.000003642024,0.0003217432,0.00004039563,0.00002267749,0.00003746492,0.000008798029,0.000009795849,0.1309709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986506,0.000005463954,0.0005522846,0.00002217108,0.00002507126,0.000005186633,0.000008524269,0.000003581536,0.0007270843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4006584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007581907485752475,"score_gpt":0.2490262874962492,"score_spread":0.2414443800104968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}