{"id":"W2791932334","doi":"10.1080/02286203.2018.1451711","title":"A scenario simulation approach for sustainable mobility project evaluation based on fuzzy cognitive maps","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Modelling and Simulation","topic":"Cognitive Science and Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Fuzzy cognitive map; Fuzzy logic; Sustainability; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Delphi method; Fuzzy set; Set (abstract data type); Management science; Operations research; Fuzzy number; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002271508,0.0001053173,0.0001232738,0.0003983762,0.0001878218,0.0002579688,0.0002448101,0.00005361029,0.000002080804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006095286,0.00009338105,0.00007658785,0.0002036775,0.00005639229,0.001052599,0.00003834988,0.00009592854,8.004013e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001467601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002671909,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001498848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.430399e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998374,0.00008412403,0.0003472866,0.0002670431,0.0007671715,0.0001603823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934883,0.0005750167,0.0003229871,0.00009051555,0.005477512,0.00004565351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002742269,0.0001115595,0.00009965386,0.000009551558,0.00001890312,0.000001227416,0.0007448403,0.9757012,0.00001644087,0.00127079,0.000007556876,0.02174405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00133782,0.0003731016,0.0001584039,0.00007930355,0.00002322487,0.000002719512,0.0002360934,0.9856445,0.0001456685,0.01175114,0.0001465336,0.0001015455],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06615423,0.00002085477,0.932197,0.0001308232,0.0001834953,0.000473736,0.000003512345,0.00001579862,0.0008205354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9764221,0.000002874956,0.02303036,0.0001664275,0.0003106908,0.00001230474,0.00001708655,0.000005283573,0.00003289785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9102678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3807969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08849873360582923,"score_gpt":0.3664141558573408,"score_spread":0.2779154222515116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}