{"id":"W2791953999","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_7","title":"A Case for Graphic Design Thinking","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Design research foundations","topic":"Media, Communication, and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Emily Carr University of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Diagrammatic reasoning; Representation (politics); Epistemology; Graphic design; Design thinking; Mode (computer interface); Generative grammar; Action (physics); Computer science; Cognitive science; Sociology; Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Multimedia; Philosophy; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01458262,0.0002037005,0.0002298921,0.0008528573,0.006718801,0.0006455987,0.001009909,0.0004221102,0.002735379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003411197,0.0002214929,0.0001387178,0.0003373511,0.00151133,0.0003507298,0.00009155485,0.000621332,0.0006740163],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004950052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003882635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008538494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002976296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960525,0.001324366,0.0003973431,0.0004574952,0.001122418,0.0006458526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893815,0.006787695,0.0001947156,0.0009201773,0.002416477,0.0002994398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000288707,0.00005299989,0.000002200692,0.00003612863,0.00007820652,0.00001623125,0.05518791,0.000006743819,0.000006994818,0.7938907,0.1451318,0.005561242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009807686,0.0001051593,8.244886e-7,0.00008186394,0.0000351618,0.00001504263,0.002948389,0.0001626133,0.000005212569,0.5556262,0.4407411,0.0001803962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017367,0.0005248479,0.507541,0.00400036,0.000916182,0.004619327,0.000035329,0.000185785,0.4821598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008304003,0.003806917,0.116153,0.0001672541,0.003702452,0.001787938,0.0004558883,0.000150575,0.865472],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.391388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6033613133719953,"score_gpt":0.5115191140724314,"score_spread":0.09184219929956383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}