{"id":"W2791953999","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_7","title":"A Case for Graphic Design Thinking","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Design research foundations","topic":"Media, Communication, and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Emily Carr University of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Diagrammatic reasoning; Representation (politics); Epistemology; Graphic design; Design thinking; Mode (computer interface); Generative grammar; Action (physics); Computer science; Cognitive science; Sociology; Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Multimedia; Philosophy; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007950298,0.001108617,0.0006066854,0.003892666,0.005817339,0.01848715,0.002690288,0.006734265,0.0225642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01541166,0.0006541846,0.001051932,0.00246562,0.03494956,0.01320658,0.005107527,0.007892126,0.00314053],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005347221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003693392,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003433906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004383423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992568,0.005278013,0.0001369721,0.0005089615,0.001091729,0.0004161914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857196,0.01145101,0.0002076037,0.001545359,0.0006468684,0.0004295033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004042571,0.000006711892,0.00002348035,0.00003181373,0.000001229563,0.00006646168,0.002978046,0.0001047626,0.00005084488,0.9884808,0.003557752,0.00469398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001557324,0.000008171401,0.00004244236,0.0002746597,0.000004880403,0.0001900206,0.003274466,0.0009283797,0.0001743201,0.8060924,0.1889831,0.00001164695],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006975924,0.005956232,0.1957725,0.06408557,0.001671815,0.0001498741,0.00009971472,0.000434646,0.7248538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4972585,0.005753207,0.2767421,0.01630176,0.001075997,0.0009939119,0.0001653131,0.00114154,0.2005677],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0225642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07548475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6033613133719953,"score_gpt":0.5115191140724314,"score_spread":0.09184219929956383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}