{"id":"W2792038613","doi":"10.1007/s11042-018-5837-4","title":"Saliency inspired quality assessment of stereoscopic 3D video","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Multimedia Tools and Applications","topic":"Image and Video Quality Assessment","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Stereoscopy; Computer science; Subjective video quality; Computer vision; Distortion (music); Quality (philosophy); Artificial intelligence; Metric (unit); Quality assessment; Task (project management); Video quality; Eye tracking; Pipeline (software); Image quality; Engineering; Image (mathematics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006511646,0.0004679327,0.0004783317,0.00141578,0.0001548521,0.000813841,0.0005172377,0.000522421,0.001037167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002808713,0.0001798072,0.0003880139,0.0005623699,0.0003204287,0.0006848567,0.0006377797,0.0003350628,0.0001386466],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004854468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026693,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001210464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001340356,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996314,0.00007097361,0.00001216199,0.00005746303,0.0001966526,0.00003131012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990684,0.0002393004,0.000141806,0.00007849453,0.000395295,0.00007668923],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001199645,0.0001736272,0.006947012,0.000651129,0.000236012,0.0004054265,0.0002880442,0.1926475,0.3015358,0.01439474,0.002532067,0.478989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001685534,0.000175322,0.004344626,0.00001775927,0.00004542724,0.0002347852,0.00003290256,0.9679536,0.0231402,0.003290833,0.0007307879,0.0000169149],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1404609,0.0007820748,0.8555009,0.0001572214,0.00005953024,0.00007830342,0.0001377807,0.0002687467,0.002554571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8674405,0.0004061137,0.1309403,0.00004948006,0.0001001049,0.00002302112,0.0001774107,0.00007500887,0.0007879552],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00141578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003522217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08832387640787122,"score_gpt":0.3931971962749602,"score_spread":0.304873319867089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}