{"id":"W2792040161","doi":"10.4236/ojs.2018.81012","title":"Simulated Minimum Hellinger Distance Inference Methods for Count Data","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Journal of Statistics","topic":"Statistical Methods and Inference","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Ontario Universities’ Application Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Hellinger distance; Mathematics; Count data; Goodness of fit; Parametric statistics; Statistics; Robustness (evolution); Homogeneity (statistics); Inference; Applied mathematics; Algorithm; Computer science; Poisson distribution; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003902609,0.0002051441,0.0006452961,0.00005869325,0.0001691271,0.0002760383,0.001779672,0.00008324116,0.0005223734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0248456,0.0001606856,0.00003843363,0.0001749188,0.0002606572,0.000293938,0.0003963751,0.0002469308,0.00001131883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003027469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001241392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001366649,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976971,0.0003217889,0.001081247,0.0002781922,0.0002988642,0.0003228653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836275,0.01277012,0.0009316195,0.0007050081,0.001761895,0.0002038714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006367648,0.0002953072,0.000134092,0.000226171,0.0002239435,0.00003047072,0.0005740557,0.00001480187,0.0007334779,0.6729051,0.05804627,0.2661795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009315947,0.0008113734,0.000078107,0.0002259457,0.0001979979,0.00001929442,0.00009191222,0.07735981,0.0006558933,0.8545236,0.0648552,0.0002492727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.000273366,0.00009142034,0.9957317,0.0001190405,0.0006739853,0.0003681937,0.00183885,0.000007502366,0.0008959593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009692611,0.00007422911,0.9893654,0.0001635667,0.0002864698,0.000002982852,0.00002627433,0.00003528368,0.0003531726],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2659302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9833685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.380619580975107,"score_gpt":0.5567857153716702,"score_spread":0.1761661343965633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}