{"id":"W2792240975","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.001","title":"National attention to endangered wildlife is not affected by global endangerment: A case study of Canada’s species at risk program","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Policy","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Threatened species; Endangered species; Wildlife; Subspecies; Conservation-dependent species; Umbrella species; Habitat; Endemism; Biodiversity; Geography; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Near-threatened species; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000456884,0.0002167664,0.0001704009,0.00007222313,0.001051148,0.00003355997,0.0004131566,0.00005831151,0.001457505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001087939,0.0002139577,0.00004248941,0.0008295898,0.001282169,0.0003462324,0.0005836308,0.00008598698,0.0002242075],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004070293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002349926,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2761236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4140129,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970276,0.0001081721,0.0003249563,0.0006577836,0.001297937,0.0005835088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991232,0.00002756759,0.0002235427,0.0002919544,0.00001236474,0.0003214063],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005499654,0.001554845,0.9360475,0.000001713974,0.00002211028,0.00002998136,0.002867989,0.00004926505,0.02336253,0.00001733822,0.03107045,0.004921299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006100003,0.0008689539,0.9892058,0.000002990477,0.00001673931,0.0001093568,0.001173436,0.0001801559,0.002590896,0.00002002753,0.005004202,0.0002174577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.994764,0.000002780895,0.000007241713,0.001229577,0.0001366713,0.0009265609,0.0003558261,0.00003011868,0.002547278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961626,0.000002635995,0.0001872669,0.002154969,0.0001011174,0.00008912324,0.00001328352,0.000009110907,0.001279877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1378892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997529,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00961249218056277,"score_gpt":0.2563489789564241,"score_spread":0.2467364867758614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}