{"id":"W2792502156","doi":"10.1080/20442041.2018.1427950","title":"A comprehensive evaluation of <i>Daphnia pulex</i> foraging energetics and the influence of spatially heterogeneous food","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inland Waters","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto Mississauga","keywords":"Foraging; Daphnia pulex; Zooplankton; Daphnia; Biology; Pulex; Ecology; Optimal foraging theory; Energetics; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002766234,0.00005626774,0.0001020811,0.00001376404,0.00007865116,0.000003611417,0.00008204339,0.00001941424,0.00001130348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002546069,0.00003556088,0.00001638556,0.0000464953,0.0007209112,0.00004435734,0.0001623066,0.00002162475,0.000004638882],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001113282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002497822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009750504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006374667,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994465,0.00007656623,0.0001284638,0.00009954134,0.0001570425,0.00009190018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997309,0.00004760133,0.00008007171,0.00009651509,0.00003311837,0.00001181884],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001655333,0.00003412173,0.9391892,0.00003593211,0.0001359534,7.606779e-7,0.003692039,0.0525194,0.001092625,0.00009195909,0.0005027204,0.002539759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002007269,0.0003730215,0.9803431,0.00002011312,0.0001586765,0.000003633626,0.0001142711,0.004193272,0.006752247,0.004741284,0.00117788,0.0001152176],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984804,0.00002382279,0.00009488903,0.0002535579,0.00004451584,0.0002005619,0.000002114757,0.000003818528,0.000896266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994915,0.0000421123,0.0001245981,0.0003090322,0.000007649694,0.00001303113,9.611036e-7,0.000002681549,0.0000084102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04832612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2656227,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01354392280088391,"score_gpt":0.2257980262073835,"score_spread":0.2122541034064996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}