{"id":"W2792526048","doi":"","title":"REVISITING THE ROLE OF PRESUMPTIONS OF LEGISLATIVE INTENT IN STATUTORY INTERPRETATION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Law; Legislative intent; Legislature; Consistency (knowledge bases); Substantive law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Judicial interpretation; Reflexivity; Meaning (existential); Presumption; Legislative history; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009371336,0.00003564107,0.0001253989,0.00001778113,0.000771021,0.00001595612,0.0003019839,0.00001345359,0.00005401754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009737948,0.00002142214,0.00004677682,0.00005906291,0.0007562155,0.00007738912,0.00002823691,0.00007059739,0.000008159735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001030103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004726101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6321737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8075404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993927,0.0001714923,0.0001647049,0.00005155184,0.0001180469,0.00010149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994498,0.00008817238,0.0001705751,0.0001506183,0.0001067648,0.00003402832],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001736514,0.000002219766,0.00593044,0.00005793343,0.00002040126,4.145498e-7,0.008232228,0.000002674178,0.000003764746,0.8678754,0.0001582015,0.1177146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006057666,0.000009331378,0.1242018,0.006056004,0.00007637885,4.063401e-7,0.004419553,0.00002500058,0.000007213872,0.0297142,0.8353364,0.00009316479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006944829,0.2161594,0.00001099129,0.06482619,0.0001617187,0.000931395,0.00004551821,0.000005287919,0.7109147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805719,0.01901259,0.000005865658,0.0002555675,0.00005369042,0.0000152412,7.190716e-7,0.000001265754,0.00008312135],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9736271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5930148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04585659003790925,"score_gpt":0.333922354086168,"score_spread":0.2880657640482587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}