{"id":"W2792526048","doi":"","title":"REVISITING THE ROLE OF PRESUMPTIONS OF LEGISLATIVE INTENT IN STATUTORY INTERPRETATION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory interpretation; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Statutory law; Law; Legislative intent; Legislature; Consistency (knowledge bases); Substantive law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Judicial interpretation; Reflexivity; Meaning (existential); Presumption; Legislative history; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06194469,0.0007239521,0.001556113,0.004125543,0.008480109,0.01628719,0.008084268,0.007695185,0.002173634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06645964,0.001446488,0.001695666,0.002973346,0.09653158,0.02132702,0.009422692,0.02497603,0.0006760451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02051105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03001617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04740497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05770248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9362062,0.02734272,0.004239868,0.005144336,0.02351453,0.003552335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9224787,0.05684372,0.003814022,0.007736885,0.008454691,0.0006720176],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000254989,0.000001746737,0.00006394948,0.00002601603,0.000003071144,0.00002587748,0.002449014,0.00009929771,0.00004488346,0.995339,0.0002776085,0.001666919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001516043,0.0000154233,0.0004020584,0.0004350921,0.00002397728,0.00008587247,0.001525537,0.0006396163,0.0003915327,0.9636984,0.03273196,0.00003548529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04944016,0.02100765,0.3866985,0.1414686,0.002439933,0.000181254,0.000251774,0.0002747354,0.3982374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377096,0.004120106,0.03617566,0.01316728,0.001666517,0.0001921418,0.00008065279,0.0001832654,0.006704755],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9525951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3275988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04585659003790925,"score_gpt":0.333922354086168,"score_spread":0.2880657640482587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}