{"id":"W2792589245","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.02.005","title":"In the eye of the beholder: Evaluative context modulates mind-wandering","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Psychologica","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mind-wandering; Context (archaeology); Task (project management); Psychology; Section (typography); Cognitive psychology; Reading (process); Subject (documents); Cognition; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; History; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004150043,0.0002142774,0.000274104,0.0002716589,0.000406544,0.001152179,0.0002516163,0.0006662685,0.004448793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005697786,0.0002019512,0.0001720734,0.0001750836,0.0005417407,0.0008307473,0.0009201015,0.000704557,0.0002631512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003214277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003995704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001382158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00182504,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997081,0.00006358834,0.00001413162,0.00008669227,0.00007592448,0.00005147906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991054,0.000481413,0.0001482132,0.00007359061,0.00008263811,0.0001088088],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003613661,0.0002532421,0.01280557,0.0003189028,0.00008941176,0.00052217,0.004478983,0.0002785204,0.9398072,0.003919068,0.001309545,0.03260374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006633988,0.001699215,0.7665995,0.0003885623,0.0005204704,0.001909932,0.008317556,0.007814487,0.1604978,0.04280848,0.008631784,0.0001488814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898582,0.00110053,0.002633071,0.0004471925,0.0002293763,0.00002876818,0.00007623382,0.00002827503,0.005598275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968538,0.0002432288,0.001482055,0.0001988905,0.00003792541,0.00001403955,0.00003646045,0.00004072658,0.001093008],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004448793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01488274,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1088589712096502,"score_gpt":0.3642436939885045,"score_spread":0.2553847227788543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}