{"id":"W2792589245","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.02.005","title":"In the eye of the beholder: Evaluative context modulates mind-wandering","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Psychologica","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mind-wandering; Context (archaeology); Task (project management); Psychology; Section (typography); Cognitive psychology; Reading (process); Subject (documents); Cognition; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy; History; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004272118,0.00008829047,0.00009733556,0.00003110867,0.0001495718,0.00002397909,0.0004625797,0.00005264268,0.0002645721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003018944,0.00004325631,0.00005878256,0.0002514925,0.0003016678,0.00007984776,0.0000535934,0.0001461928,0.00003235432],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008189198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007581914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000086386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009984185,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99891,0.0002691742,0.0001727184,0.0002596906,0.0002167941,0.0001716219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993377,0.0001562352,0.0001098351,0.0003580297,0.00002376639,0.00001447914],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007850331,0.0002805099,0.006241816,0.000006040638,0.000006107404,0.000005362053,0.006519401,0.000005990648,0.9705079,0.0006811887,0.003042679,0.0126245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00128522,0.0006924559,0.4731417,0.00008262211,0.00002062388,0.00003473094,0.001818543,0.0005754167,0.5033475,0.005778452,0.01296898,0.0002537669],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9862321,0.00002104276,0.00002843125,0.003574487,0.0003300521,0.0002123865,0.00000324079,0.000008584849,0.009589698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975564,0.00001105636,0.00002170531,0.001937168,0.00005883677,0.00001412993,1.967844e-7,0.000004641106,0.0003958779],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4671605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2896879,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1088589712096502,"score_gpt":0.3642436939885045,"score_spread":0.2553847227788543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}