{"id":"W2792719879","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12096","title":"Wandering footloose: Traditional knowledge and the “Public Domain” revisited","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of World Intellectual Property","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Custodians; Public domain; Political science; Traditional knowledge; Law and economics; Intellectual property; Negotiation; Public interest; Corporate governance; Sociology; Law; Indigenous; Economics; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00301051,0.0002381584,0.0003446143,0.0003259128,0.0009747387,0.0003782422,0.0007249995,0.00004773556,0.002689263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001460393,0.00008425489,0.0001541517,0.0008830766,0.001025292,0.0007720829,0.0002702475,0.0006082777,0.0005517395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004167547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006426468,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004011437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009144227,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998324,0.0002011393,0.0006069,0.0001542587,0.0003738359,0.0003398007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978169,0.0007720428,0.0003503548,0.0002329488,0.0007966925,0.00003108794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008422023,0.0004177494,0.0001932435,0.0002345285,0.0006987768,0.00001312722,0.01354424,0.000008901291,0.001580205,0.03419539,0.8915997,0.04909214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002624814,0.0002254182,0.0001891886,0.0003462185,0.0001901658,0.0003670767,0.0009246473,0.006247363,0.0004790551,0.0144361,0.9736405,0.0003294232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3903035,0.009137541,0.006934118,0.04834808,0.003502452,0.001598605,0.000004089013,0.0001615458,0.54001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874299,0.0001760085,0.00005827545,0.003541124,0.003985606,0.000003993375,0.000001985848,0.00003131099,0.004771811],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5971264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1467112732269803,"score_gpt":0.2353228481774351,"score_spread":0.08861157495045477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}