{"id":"W2792805190","doi":"10.1177/1062860617751639","title":"Readability of Online Health Information: A Meta-Narrative Systematic Review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"American Journal of Medical Quality","topic":"Health Literacy and Information Accessibility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":256,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Readability; Misinformation; Medicine; Reading (process); Health information; Public health; Medical education; Quality (philosophy); Grade level; Health care; Computer science; Psychology; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","metaepi_broad","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09003181,0.0005604028,0.01531373,0.0003304885,0.0003696842,0.00001471814,0.001629551,0.000440042,0.002213984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04683072,0.0003015573,0.001991709,0.001413323,0.0009327772,0.001196434,0.000262145,0.003561085,0.00009389193],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000784374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01745941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004690053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003973078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9365555,0.03019797,0.02873291,0.0002646725,0.003609567,0.0006393822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9311912,0.007425651,0.05517356,0.001344776,0.003495708,0.001369076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001920561,0.0001256115,0.0000047026,0.7647905,0.0008034005,7.39485e-7,0.004110585,7.324433e-9,8.237146e-11,0.000140203,0.006316996,0.2236881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001273721,0.0004175256,0.000008228981,0.506147,0.002120511,0.00003687956,0.004018149,0.000003206572,4.731872e-9,0.00004545004,0.4869118,0.000163892],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001625989,0.9865177,0.001753974,0.006787528,0.0006323479,0.003621103,0.0004524702,0.00002697036,0.0001916319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000008392819,0.9699621,0.001660862,0.02763971,0.0003522997,0.000132754,0.0001936937,0.00001816144,0.00003204643],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4805948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999437,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2684902053959505,"score_gpt":0.6217029670034592,"score_spread":0.3532127616075086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}