{"id":"W2792805401","doi":"10.3758/s13421-018-0804-x","title":"Reasoning from an incompatibility: False dilemma fallacies and content effects","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Memory & Cognition","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Falsity; Fallacy; Counterexample; Psychology; Dilemma; Statement (logic); Semantic reasoner; Epistemology; Proposition; Content (measure theory); Deception; Cognitive psychology; Inference; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031731,0.0001057636,0.0001707774,0.00003373913,0.000654866,0.0001117897,0.00007829044,0.00005779784,0.00008272922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001695701,0.0001101676,0.00002757774,0.0000545454,0.0006426445,0.000427651,0.00007297476,0.00006070361,0.0000652951],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009900016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002324986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01042644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0151451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990494,0.0001886012,0.0001521525,0.0002881566,0.0001296043,0.0001921487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994767,0.0001163064,0.00007265538,0.000115772,0.000115406,0.0001032169],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004032175,0.0007809232,0.3646665,0.00005246541,0.0001681095,0.00002969232,0.2145862,5.39303e-7,0.2608413,0.007400488,0.0005074256,0.1505632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002367055,0.001106848,0.7289299,0.0002979713,0.000220763,0.000002149493,0.100721,0.0001340298,0.1494413,0.0143959,0.001461717,0.0009213311],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.991289,0.0001722946,0.00001931198,0.000179193,0.0003416669,0.0003302423,0.00002025513,0.00009644188,0.0075516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987892,0.00003289713,0.0004291085,0.0002765171,0.0003299542,0.00003923639,0.00002912565,0.000009404496,0.0000645901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3642634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06499087598819243,"score_gpt":0.3430273998472735,"score_spread":0.2780365238590811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}