{"id":"W2793072605","doi":"10.29173/alr1295","title":"Making Sense of Juristic Reasons: Unjust Enrichment after Garland v. Consumers' Gas","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unjust enrichment; Supreme court; Law; Liability; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Restitution","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01504154,0.0003428526,0.0007189031,0.001531811,0.009478377,0.009609429,0.001846749,0.01278239,0.001595521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01617018,0.0003987858,0.0006685893,0.001507991,0.03855703,0.00569844,0.004216359,0.01235816,0.0002194115],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0217957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02690338,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2130267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4130168,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871695,0.005213882,0.0002963069,0.0008126144,0.004773753,0.001733853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893659,0.008140487,0.0004374365,0.0003945506,0.001352882,0.0003087444],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008125203,0.000007277094,0.0002388277,0.0000272499,0.000006536297,0.0002393074,0.004272223,0.0001084059,0.00008253515,0.9829047,0.007245714,0.004859069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003759762,0.00003383636,0.002378021,0.0004113438,0.00004704017,0.0001206738,0.00998636,0.0003301101,0.0007100087,0.691614,0.2942721,0.00005896075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04918795,0.04199932,0.008887501,0.5361442,0.002806042,0.00006791628,0.00007095849,0.0000552669,0.3607809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8779892,0.009767178,0.002289189,0.08001588,0.001272112,0.00004760669,0.0000279005,0.0000472403,0.02854375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7869732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4235736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03202289567105941,"score_gpt":0.34557724581775,"score_spread":0.3135543501466906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}