{"id":"W2793107543","doi":"10.1016/j.mex.2018.02.002","title":"Assessing stand species and structural diversity at neighbourhood scale","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MethodsX","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Forest Research Institute; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"","keywords":"Neighbourhood (mathematics); Diversity (politics); Scale (ratio); Geography; Ecology; Biology; Mathematics; Cartography; Sociology; Anthropology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001332032,0.0003226078,0.0004147568,0.003622446,0.0006544596,0.000837906,0.0004403594,0.0003185123,0.00363884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003597285,0.0001752362,0.0004274698,0.002468313,0.0002674196,0.0009790186,0.001190578,0.000310091,0.0007951728],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003849699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000318298,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004650698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02476622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998998,0.0001882571,0.00008878223,0.0001856714,0.0004675513,0.00007175762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977525,0.0006266051,0.0005304976,0.0002077344,0.0006946411,0.0001880918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001123221,0.00008651373,0.898918,0.0001992933,0.0002346123,0.0001795064,0.001186556,0.005222138,0.0073806,0.002131002,0.001391263,0.08295818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009512451,0.0001663863,0.9790633,0.00005114392,0.00005559541,0.0002714487,0.0009486903,0.01118291,0.002342687,0.002315323,0.003559286,0.0000336806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.9404669,0.0004073318,0.03772163,0.00003771906,0.00001833734,0.0002621169,0.005454074,0.0001679899,0.01546391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591581,0.0001821527,0.03304545,0.00001675134,0.00001465351,0.0003075555,0.004357134,0.00003035513,0.002887795],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004650698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01217312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03454975971496022,"score_gpt":0.290079453031713,"score_spread":0.2555296933167528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}