{"id":"W2793451262","doi":"10.1002/icd.2085","title":"A dyadic analysis of power in sibling and friend conflict in early childhood","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Infant and Child Development","topic":"Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Concordia University","keywords":"Psychology; Sibling; Social psychology; Socialization; Developmental psychology; Power (physics); Sibling relationship; Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001050845,0.0001768729,0.0002738002,0.001135247,0.0008349315,0.000722677,0.0002641482,0.0001476086,0.001423451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004280899,0.0001947881,0.0002050169,0.0009840159,0.0004056995,0.0004702332,0.0009463982,0.0003071454,0.0001103232],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005949992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004535135,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01017681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02691957,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988298,0.0007079673,0.00005431972,0.000099647,0.0001864391,0.0001218002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983037,0.0007584114,0.0004181676,0.0001069181,0.0002382647,0.0001745518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002006161,0.00009440559,0.8995918,0.0001376531,0.0001173909,0.0009522105,0.05811197,0.0004201674,0.00590625,0.0009776226,0.0004018632,0.03308797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001951637,0.00008479212,0.9732449,0.00002210952,0.00002639453,0.0005467247,0.02383081,0.0004137765,0.0007643392,0.0002177942,0.0008346544,0.00001178002],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987828,0.0001371655,0.0004136768,0.00001552128,0.000001385416,0.000006671437,0.00005692292,0.000002272951,0.0005835404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991615,0.00009450978,0.0004840938,0.000002388801,9.261552e-7,0.0000130346,0.00007093741,0.000001590092,0.0001710607],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01017681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02023512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01211443293477461,"score_gpt":0.2655320457065119,"score_spread":0.2534176127717373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}