{"id":"W2793451262","doi":"10.1002/icd.2085","title":"A dyadic analysis of power in sibling and friend conflict in early childhood","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Infant and Child Development","topic":"Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Concordia University","keywords":"Psychology; Sibling; Social psychology; Socialization; Developmental psychology; Power (physics); Sibling relationship; Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002783076,0.0001653572,0.0003520945,0.0007575704,0.00008550136,0.00002294555,0.00008706742,0.00009350181,0.0002382845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001057531,0.0001483715,0.00004403144,0.0008762169,0.0001104331,0.00005759527,0.0000631319,0.0001463386,0.00001269084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002303612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004579407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001491441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004740758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986511,0.00003407796,0.0005028739,0.0003630246,0.0001711309,0.0002777957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996453,0.00003029673,0.00009406906,0.0001086421,0.0000344865,0.00008724158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007616224,0.0002927223,0.9207708,0.00001372244,0.0003618484,0.000009645657,0.06767213,8.746536e-7,0.00001685975,0.002748051,0.00006178889,0.007975379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001075257,0.00004615601,0.9917442,0.0002363873,0.00002579282,0.000005105347,0.000669653,0.000004522909,0.00005721083,0.0001273225,0.005807547,0.0002008677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852549,0.0008337353,0.00001474785,0.0002701925,0.0001938307,0.0001652649,0.000007388128,0.00001163822,0.01324825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991264,0.0001255826,0.000158042,0.0003944561,0.00004169218,0.000009180438,0.00001641091,0.000008023959,0.000120158],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07097337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6050416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01211443293477461,"score_gpt":0.2655320457065119,"score_spread":0.2534176127717373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}