{"id":"W2793766532","doi":"10.1007/s11136-018-1826-3","title":"Evaluation of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL) using item response theory reveals limitations and suggests revisions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quality of Life Research","topic":"Pelvic floor disorders treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Embarrassment; Medicine; Quality of life (healthcare); Fecal incontinence; Differential item functioning; Confirmatory factor analysis; Construct validity; Item response theory; Clinical psychology; Patient-reported outcome; Coping (psychology); Scale (ratio); Psychometrics; Physical therapy; Structural equation modeling; Psychology; Surgery; Statistics; Social psychology; Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.08157792,0.0001376895,0.0006303706,0.0003126074,0.000230844,0.00001147074,0.000262956,0.0001550135,0.0001092651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1386542,0.0001029021,0.0001449866,0.0009673521,0.001977085,0.0001158451,0.000253966,0.0003062366,0.00000621304],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001579183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001724379,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001071411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003137414,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9815358,0.01289971,0.001381377,0.0003790022,0.003449313,0.0003547804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771944,0.0145375,0.0007250294,0.001336609,0.005880802,0.0003256293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01126963,0.001738432,0.703821,0.001413403,0.0004207818,6.109655e-7,0.009565019,0.000008767884,0.2516596,0.002443227,0.0006024045,0.01705714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002790768,0.0004308246,0.9847202,0.0006892674,0.0001251913,0.0000013524,0.003261863,0.0004927203,0.003865002,0.003512789,0.00002308548,0.00008697165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938669,0.001355289,0.0001121338,0.00240846,0.00004499743,0.001151327,0.00006387081,0.00001101417,0.0009860741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982769,0.00007889276,0.001266004,0.00009071545,0.00005753076,0.00001701736,0.000007141831,0.00001631465,0.0001894114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2808992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9457088,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4662632396598027,"score_gpt":0.5289660814367486,"score_spread":0.0627028417769459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}