{"id":"W2793823312","doi":"10.1109/tse.2018.2810895","title":"Asymmetric Release Planning: Compromising Satisfaction against Dissatisfaction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","topic":"Software Engineering Techniques and Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Heuristics; Computer science; Completeness (order theory); Categorical variable; Feature (linguistics); Customer satisfaction; Stakeholder; Product (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Process management; Operations research; Machine learning; Marketing; Mathematics; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005231511,0.001419951,0.0009337389,0.0008162891,0.0006668395,0.001835323,0.001064268,0.0009435451,0.002216304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01377782,0.0005453543,0.0006334996,0.0007166,0.000764375,0.001666939,0.00135021,0.001217147,0.0002807988],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009500264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001677912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001248851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001377822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965451,0.001684045,0.0001869577,0.0004401834,0.0007093134,0.0004343226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992012,0.004812964,0.001279434,0.00066329,0.0007453354,0.0004869228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00108455,0.00100058,0.01188043,0.0006059682,0.0002554173,0.0005231149,0.0009006875,0.749195,0.0382964,0.01568922,0.001916147,0.1786526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001504053,0.001596316,0.006398906,0.00008020865,0.0001508376,0.0002612081,0.000656709,0.9613096,0.01054337,0.01682932,0.001953073,0.000070071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4701376,0.0004542317,0.5168089,0.0006541451,0.00005351672,0.0005035442,0.0001419932,0.0003974404,0.01084868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9376325,0.0001039764,0.06054385,0.0001156714,0.00001510285,0.0001826109,0.00008420687,0.00007409159,0.001247985],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005231511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02766722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01688160305511816,"score_gpt":0.2535271735852926,"score_spread":0.2366455705301745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}