{"id":"W2794025086","doi":"10.1017/s0008413100001651","title":"Idan Landau 2009. The locative syntax of experiencers. In the series <i>Linguistic Inquiry Monograph</i> 53. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press. Pp. vi + 165. US $26.00 (softcover).","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique","topic":"Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Locative case; Syntax; Linguistics; Series (stratigraphy); Content (measure theory); Psychology; Media studies; Cognitive science; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004141139,0.0005475496,0.000776139,0.0004000324,0.001094985,0.0006113056,0.002054983,0.0002776989,0.00007578026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04782411,0.0003793236,0.0003059687,0.0003423737,0.002243395,0.00006754135,0.00006723944,0.002068433,0.00000539756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004410441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002782914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3301989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9075113,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958253,0.0006280894,0.001557593,0.0004083074,0.0003935635,0.001187136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908471,0.002194644,0.001560517,0.00112686,0.003563859,0.000707001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001138977,0.00005842397,0.002902423,0.0001777923,0.000198551,0.001347302,0.2772429,0.0005798886,0.00003126366,0.7142268,0.003028024,0.00009278609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001185321,0.0005437145,0.005008976,0.001089252,0.0007494933,0.001463263,0.04145522,0.001187316,0.0003981373,0.07264189,0.873138,0.001139378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8549479,0.007277237,0.0004320886,0.01942319,0.03858766,0.002288446,0.001363883,0.0001099199,0.07556974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851846,0.0001651659,0.0005399736,0.0008979242,0.01264515,0.00004087588,0.00001798089,0.0001066731,0.0004016312],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.87011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998659,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0180812201667746,"score_gpt":0.2328694890616353,"score_spread":0.2147882688948607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}