{"id":"W2794047651","doi":"10.1097/sla.0000000000002708","title":"An Economic Evaluation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) in Alberta, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Surgery","topic":"Primary Care and Health Outcomes","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health; Alberta Health Services; Institute of Health Economics","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Medicine; Psychological intervention; Unit cost; Economic evaluation; Cost–benefit analysis; Cost effectiveness; Health care; Emergency medicine; Unit (ring theory); Operations management; Risk analysis (engineering); Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00688594,0.00008626774,0.000329402,0.00007832645,0.00014397,0.000002139,0.0001461959,0.00009326064,0.0006230621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004351443,0.00006518656,0.00008587547,0.0001288344,0.00007762441,0.0001179574,0.0000504257,0.0001575144,0.000008089227],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004582402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01442503,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7575647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9018124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969608,0.0009162257,0.001020049,0.0001714877,0.0006115662,0.000319931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678,0.001577685,0.0005158743,0.0002434711,0.0008042315,0.00007868098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001327171,0.0002018298,0.8528715,0.0002116966,0.00003371375,3.153831e-7,0.0004834909,0.00001638883,0.0000421972,0.001404603,0.09771869,0.04688282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003211547,0.00004637485,0.957313,0.00005267112,0.00000660514,1.829759e-7,0.0001634318,0.0001822151,0.0005328275,0.0009419838,0.04035462,0.00008495415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781553,0.00004512372,1.246027e-7,0.01236668,0.0007443418,0.0006137416,0.00006423596,0.000006324053,0.008004139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936842,0.00003016913,0.00000808933,0.00574859,0.0002366104,0.0001215775,0.00003034146,0.000007338906,0.0001331028],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1442477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911622,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4323957609689725,"score_gpt":0.5555405421401787,"score_spread":0.1231447811712061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}