{"id":"W2794047651","doi":"10.1097/sla.0000000000002708","title":"An Economic Evaluation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) in Alberta, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Surgery","topic":"Primary Care and Health Outcomes","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health; Alberta Health Services; Institute of Health Economics","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Medicine; Psychological intervention; Unit cost; Economic evaluation; Cost–benefit analysis; Cost effectiveness; Health care; Emergency medicine; Unit (ring theory); Operations management; Risk analysis (engineering); Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01268686,0.001444462,0.001048844,0.002697128,0.002190458,0.002729719,0.002167256,0.0009715493,0.003107101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0232833,0.0004322916,0.001970924,0.004371735,0.001381761,0.0008827405,0.001788562,0.001585934,0.0001158944],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1555268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1759927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9789763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9732981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9830995,0.006446536,0.0005651818,0.000534421,0.006961757,0.002392586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864749,0.003531457,0.001118888,0.000291796,0.006554103,0.002028783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.05738198,0.00909084,0.388385,0.01184847,0.008601889,0.001103522,0.001393687,0.2320933,0.002223159,0.02525766,0.03210416,0.2305164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01449308,0.01897549,0.7334745,0.003687021,0.005206799,0.0003787268,0.004037891,0.1906806,0.001615398,0.002729426,0.02430091,0.0004201301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9321194,0.01434979,0.002583004,0.003812946,0.0003384405,0.005230808,0.01039989,0.0001090537,0.03105651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899886,0.00261778,0.001839994,0.0004838047,0.00004310379,0.0004947455,0.002572142,0.00001209862,0.00194772],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8444732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9794692,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4323957609689725,"score_gpt":0.5555405421401787,"score_spread":0.1231447811712061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}