{"id":"W2794161124","doi":"10.1038/s41598-018-23052-8","title":"Environmental DNA filtration techniques affect recovered biodiversity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Miljødirektoratet; Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Filtration (mathematics); Environmental DNA; Filter (signal processing); Biodiversity; Cellulose; Environmental science; Lysis; Water quality; Composition (language); Pulp and paper industry; Environmental engineering; Biology; Ecology; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Biochemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001111247,0.0005314081,0.0003162749,0.0008136333,0.000625474,0.001166214,0.0003243672,0.0006372614,0.001074413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002913208,0.0002315535,0.0004167141,0.0006304816,0.0005271668,0.0008315191,0.0007969987,0.0004298101,0.0004704038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003391272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003737643,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001792077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004101386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986054,0.0002357506,0.000143845,0.0003527544,0.0004515437,0.0002107163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980197,0.0008724699,0.0004592203,0.0001510624,0.0003868214,0.0001107733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002553121,0.00008424897,0.04514906,0.0001615189,0.00008297667,0.00007057925,0.0002769904,0.0003223717,0.9332559,0.00007826789,0.0001025547,0.02016013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000642469,0.0008188367,0.2441945,0.00006794739,0.0001075287,0.0004294923,0.000492026,0.001022099,0.7484229,0.0002023848,0.004203317,0.00003257299],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883767,0.00142974,0.007739069,0.0001068531,0.00004178366,0.00005818994,0.0004461452,0.00004776291,0.001753693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853824,0.00126238,0.009602839,0.0002299637,0.00002006222,0.00008195153,0.00134042,0.00005349445,0.002026493],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001792077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005876958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01215559141954425,"score_gpt":0.2068734505854474,"score_spread":0.1947178591659031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}