{"id":"W2794416292","doi":"10.1093/toxsci/kfy050","title":"Availability, Quality, and Relevance of Toxicogenomics Data for Human Health Risk Assessment: A Scoping Review of the Literature on Trihalomethanes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Toxicological Sciences","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université Laval; Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Health Canada; Heartland Health Research Alliance","keywords":"Toxicogenomics; Relevance (law); Quality (philosophy); Risk assessment; Human health; Computer science; Data science; Risk analysis (engineering); Medicine; Environmental health; Biology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006220905,0.0003078392,0.001467166,0.00002916631,0.0003895499,0.00004232053,0.001720792,0.0001662167,0.0003074761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001972149,0.0001536199,0.000243018,0.0006068554,0.003118107,0.0001760813,0.001795542,0.0003253938,0.000007354258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001293728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001073012,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001985329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002444447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959648,0.001043433,0.001105548,0.0009046503,0.0005803659,0.0004012122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959618,0.001739134,0.001360127,0.0007593046,0.000008629472,0.000171025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000133788,0.001014136,0.0007963818,0.2271582,0.00005302955,0.000001038961,0.00005513652,0.000002804473,0.0002653406,0.0008132,0.001006486,0.7688209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005728262,0.00402712,0.00298099,0.7962565,0.0005304204,0.00002896976,0.00002301204,0.00003724476,0.0003514675,0.004783031,0.1894243,0.0009841489],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002320372,0.9928129,0.00001157094,0.0004732322,0.00009696993,0.00253504,0.0008698594,0.000009852331,0.0008701573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008787544,0.9966934,0.001360517,0.000923131,0.00004130101,0.00001817754,0.00003155828,0.000008558537,0.00004459431],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7678367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3735775121085538,"score_gpt":0.533252988001175,"score_spread":0.1596754758926213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}