{"id":"W2794444965","doi":"10.1111/gove.12342","title":"The twin faces of public sector design","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Governance","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Carleton University","funders":"Employment and Social Development Canada","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Leverage (statistics); Politics; Corporate governance; Sociology; Public policy; Top-down and bottom-up design; Design thinking; Economics; Public relations; Positive economics; Management science; Political science; Epistemology; Management; Computer science; Economic growth; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08893165,0.0009295325,0.001523635,0.004309181,0.007141896,0.02338007,0.003177011,0.007777213,0.006221605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1022508,0.001572399,0.001128272,0.003037894,0.0462774,0.0246343,0.01272668,0.009535672,0.001265916],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009616075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01109704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002161581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002121825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8892393,0.0860901,0.003189994,0.004646476,0.01430697,0.00252724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8455282,0.1288221,0.002706927,0.0131207,0.007341481,0.002480566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003089176,0.00004284158,0.0005703757,0.0002869304,0.00002362068,0.00005924368,0.006455291,0.001779008,0.0001173566,0.9546192,0.003492722,0.03252256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002799628,0.00003946259,0.0001855866,0.0003266362,0.00001455471,0.000171505,0.004912436,0.003146878,0.0002432657,0.9272674,0.06363483,0.00002932035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0276845,0.01461653,0.59228,0.2340864,0.001775395,0.0003862796,0.00012241,0.0004617986,0.1285867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6870478,0.009151498,0.27307,0.01097481,0.001309229,0.001788169,0.0001093652,0.0006124108,0.01593673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08893165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4703211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05705257082289005,"score_gpt":0.2322387365616766,"score_spread":0.1751861657387866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}