{"id":"W2794642496","doi":"10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18010036","title":"Validating the Predictive Accuracy of the NAPLS-2 Psychosis Risk Calculator in a Clinical High-Risk Sample From the SHARP (Shanghai At Risk for Psychosis) Program","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"American Journal of Psychiatry","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"St. Jude Medical; University of British Columbia; University Health Network Foundation; H. Lundbeck A/S; Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; University of Cambridge; Victoria General Hospital Foundation; Allergan; Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments; AOP Orphan; University Health Network; Pfizer; AstraZeneca; Eli Lilly and Company","keywords":"Calculator; Psychosis; Risk assessment; Psychiatry; Sample (material); Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02828947,0.0006051477,0.002703279,0.0003022696,0.0007860424,0.0001667979,0.002659088,0.0005880363,0.0002332948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0179512,0.0004032092,0.001760322,0.0007244876,0.001118019,0.0003035609,0.0002168043,0.003678893,0.00008527104],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005928027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005671424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02069174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003669763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9828807,0.004429461,0.01041554,0.001013729,0.0004616035,0.0007989643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.935987,0.02004419,0.04147443,0.001971602,0.0003387379,0.0001840661],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001460792,0.000151553,0.5008916,0.00005217019,0.0008229136,1.78969e-7,0.0009677657,0.00004593553,1.858858e-8,0.00009704341,0.4939103,0.002914474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002529458,0.001737637,0.4813456,0.000853741,0.000593202,0.00001037339,0.002290209,0.001540864,5.153113e-7,0.02735468,0.4811516,0.0005920857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.4659522,0.002628483,0.003324201,0.5013232,0.009923928,0.00282163,0.01395279,0.00002439255,0.00004924366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1695899,0.006684374,0.09216481,0.6584411,0.07068755,0.001434726,0.0003397876,0.0005357485,0.0001220132],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2963623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999842,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1400892863795486,"score_gpt":0.4293942220511093,"score_spread":0.2893049356715607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}