{"id":"W2794642496","doi":"10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18010036","title":"Validating the Predictive Accuracy of the NAPLS-2 Psychosis Risk Calculator in a Clinical High-Risk Sample From the SHARP (Shanghai At Risk for Psychosis) Program","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"American Journal of Psychiatry","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"St. Jude Medical; University of British Columbia; University Health Network Foundation; H. Lundbeck A/S; Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; University of Cambridge; Victoria General Hospital Foundation; Allergan; Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments; AOP Orphan; University Health Network; Pfizer; AstraZeneca; Eli Lilly and Company","keywords":"Calculator; Psychosis; Risk assessment; Psychiatry; Sample (material); Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01092607,0.0002933161,0.0005377367,0.000627583,0.001142932,0.001318595,0.0008593812,0.001695007,0.002634708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08694813,0.0003654264,0.0004352116,0.0009356122,0.0005805729,0.00068234,0.00124586,0.004116011,0.001179743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001881785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003432862,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04657222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05904595,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9951932,0.002764461,0.0006062617,0.0003032391,0.0007952109,0.0003376165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9527675,0.03181679,0.002154553,0.002104781,0.009320918,0.001835358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008287178,0.00037919,0.8652148,0.0000328846,0.0000813408,0.0008935871,0.0011483,0.0006343942,0.0002057386,0.00102044,0.08935548,0.04020514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001378961,0.001314862,0.8574873,0.000996716,0.000492813,0.002504819,0.007553916,0.03824862,0.002828461,0.008200855,0.07873998,0.0002526913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7008269,0.0005859602,0.001815859,0.275762,0.002211443,0.0001957985,0.003756855,0.0001194995,0.01472575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9457986,0.0003564814,0.003777028,0.04297325,0.001001559,0.0002230374,0.001819896,0.00006910892,0.003980977],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04657222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09260225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1400892863795486,"score_gpt":0.4293942220511093,"score_spread":0.2893049356715607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}