{"id":"W2794677247","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.2168","title":"Assessing the causal relationships of ecological integrity: a re‐evaluation of Karr's iconic Index of Biotic Integrity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecosphere","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Index of biological integrity; Biological integrity; Ecology; Trophic level; Species richness; Ecosystem; Structural equation modeling; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Biology; Water quality","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01554015,0.0007678,0.0006783113,0.006455674,0.0008723821,0.003265468,0.0009272171,0.0004493247,0.001419324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03927569,0.0002488353,0.0009472651,0.005256021,0.001643161,0.002060121,0.002048398,0.001349982,0.0002274904],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001366564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001667369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01503257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02671238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.992973,0.003563614,0.0006294494,0.001040885,0.001597406,0.0001956106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9498817,0.02407121,0.006919069,0.007967985,0.01015393,0.001006093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009508747,0.0000518812,0.9297457,0.0001578243,0.0006214939,0.00009661841,0.0007904954,0.007229494,0.0009411501,0.005101632,0.001346116,0.05382253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001544015,0.0002990939,0.8820273,0.0002418658,0.0002941756,0.0002342219,0.002998526,0.09551466,0.001585602,0.009541232,0.007148851,0.00009894132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9067802,0.0009357066,0.07600534,0.001324465,0.00008916122,0.0001709793,0.002508893,0.0004469237,0.01173834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734409,0.0001173652,0.02497905,0.00008568771,0.00002939667,0.00006633631,0.0008704477,0.00004043881,0.0003703466],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01554015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08218515,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1660829472108214,"score_gpt":0.3781843088119406,"score_spread":0.2121013616011192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}