{"id":"W2794677247","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.2168","title":"Assessing the causal relationships of ecological integrity: a re‐evaluation of Karr's iconic Index of Biotic Integrity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecosphere","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Index of biological integrity; Biological integrity; Ecology; Trophic level; Species richness; Ecosystem; Structural equation modeling; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Biology; Water quality","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003790528,0.00009172179,0.0001842509,0.00001475287,0.0001225707,0.00001694284,0.0002268659,0.0001432321,0.009711096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005104389,0.0000618852,0.00006586876,0.000272205,0.0006220062,0.0002263674,0.000127681,0.000381847,0.0001087083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001918625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001004386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008165483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002488262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977563,0.0009609747,0.0004686376,0.0001743798,0.0005013875,0.0001382903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989643,0.0002617365,0.0003644954,0.0002912053,0.00007989744,0.00003840732],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007083677,0.001243421,0.9350834,0.0001018311,0.0001325908,0.000001073405,0.007229299,0.002862324,0.0121135,0.007558465,0.01140317,0.02220008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003108829,0.0001420713,0.9698346,0.00004617382,0.00005477285,0.000001563384,0.001735138,0.01166956,0.006980865,0.008820252,0.0003244317,0.00007968018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789321,0.00002513215,0.0010831,0.0007949413,0.0001443304,0.0002276628,0.000008475763,0.00001030481,0.01877393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986729,0.000003700002,0.001120419,0.00004710518,0.00003112263,0.000006270143,0.000004345407,0.000004570125,0.0001095636],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0347512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911942,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1660829472108214,"score_gpt":0.3781843088119406,"score_spread":0.2121013616011192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}