{"id":"W2794836531","doi":"10.1038/s41598-018-23502-3","title":"Using spatial mark-recapture for conservation monitoring of grizzly bear populations in Alberta","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"fRI Research; Alberta Environment and Parks; Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute","keywords":"Ursus; Grizzly Bears; Mark and recapture; Habitat; Population density; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Geography; Population; Spatial distribution; Environmental science; Biology; Demography; Remote sensing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009799261,0.0002038421,0.0001993935,0.0009022803,0.0003826162,0.000424854,0.0006714087,0.0001137032,0.0003623235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001478732,0.0001375074,0.0001741037,0.0008475783,0.000280212,0.0002799119,0.000358349,0.0001322389,0.0000733011],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002513813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002026731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8247802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9443206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996265,0.00009127988,0.00001447742,0.00007906473,0.0001513969,0.00003736699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994543,0.0001114145,0.0001474678,0.00004943421,0.0001929919,0.00004433799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001050998,0.00003098669,0.9439497,0.00004543807,0.0001076748,0.00007679907,0.0004871329,0.01265978,0.003010517,0.0001778574,0.0004717349,0.03887738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006218508,0.00002827894,0.9806371,0.00001141157,0.0000356641,0.00003466322,0.0003048762,0.01793934,0.0004292275,0.0000652585,0.0004988662,0.000009170685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961351,0.0002182515,0.002295278,0.00004297241,0.000003792022,0.00001829989,0.0003868997,0.00005716782,0.0008423161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938741,0.0001483148,0.005160905,0.00001439654,0.000003386325,0.00001168012,0.0004842009,0.000005921934,0.0002970291],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1752198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3525034,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04528351559084558,"score_gpt":0.2870956092607308,"score_spread":0.2418120936698852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}