{"id":"W2794926288","doi":"10.1115/1.4039780","title":"An Integrated Prognostics Approach for Pipeline Fatigue Crack Growth Prediction Utilizing Inline Inspection Data","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pipeline (software); Paris' law; Prognostics; Pipeline transport; Structural engineering; Reliability engineering; Finite element method; Engineering; Range (aeronautics); Fracture mechanics; Computer science; Mechanical engineering; Crack closure","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005383713,0.0001922458,0.0003918016,0.0005741849,0.0001300737,0.0000482401,0.0007822636,0.0005181983,0.00001055452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009789777,0.0001500421,0.00007478675,0.0007917319,0.0002702543,0.0005956528,0.00006675857,0.000801559,8.295374e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004509809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004143687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001590851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000191012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986094,0.00004350356,0.0006741468,0.0002550898,0.0001908125,0.0002270083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979982,0.00006378235,0.0002434176,0.0005201707,0.001105797,0.00006859922],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002198071,0.003776598,0.03981734,0.005166919,0.00961175,0.00005718902,0.003188794,0.2379454,0.3213474,0.02680416,0.1393788,0.2107076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004791167,0.0005428389,0.0003941092,0.00007385603,0.00052069,0.0001351173,0.0007565932,0.9603767,0.02055107,0.001933689,0.01407457,0.0001615765],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06254125,0.0009862883,0.9337806,0.0005016202,0.000893259,0.0003171894,0.0002159327,0.0006226404,0.0001412002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9227926,0.0002243435,0.07599566,0.00001355461,0.0007600223,0.000007043163,0.000164568,0.00002740035,0.00001480599],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8602514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6118538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03725011964963731,"score_gpt":0.2886299218948391,"score_spread":0.2513798022452018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}