{"id":"W2794988994","doi":"10.47339/ephj.2017.78","title":"Evaluating two methods of testing residual sanitizer concentrations in food service establishments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BCIT Environmental Public Health Journal","topic":"Food Safety and Hygiene","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"British Columbia Institute of Technology","keywords":"Hand sanitizer; Significant difference; Residual; Environmental science; Sanitation; Pulp and paper industry; Chlorine; Residual volume; Toxicology; Food science; Mathematics; Materials science; Chemistry; Environmental engineering; Medicine; Statistics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003582582,0.0001229355,0.0002226579,0.0000225787,0.00116995,0.0002168679,0.0004533151,0.00004700872,0.0005178977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004428558,0.00006248923,0.00004589212,0.0001130817,0.00009399646,0.0006905025,0.0001623763,0.000318095,0.000008043894],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001843249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009963365,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005198709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006754922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997714,0.0005967501,0.000597286,0.0002084681,0.0003984555,0.0004850468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986376,0.0002701575,0.0006812413,0.0001019633,0.0000303566,0.0002787031],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003158707,0.0003731952,0.06947746,0.00001962281,0.00002687474,0.000005806203,0.0004865011,0.0001183252,0.1299462,0.0002042316,0.00009627963,0.7992139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001023429,0.001172289,0.992061,0.00007373407,0.000004731497,0.00006126031,0.001105752,0.0006602227,0.0008461045,0.0007296578,0.002103694,0.0001581743],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863255,0.0001707555,0.00003804699,0.01233135,0.0001425194,0.0001938933,0.00005775398,0.000008130683,0.0007320392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871248,0.00004913985,0.01163024,0.0009377674,0.0002045959,0.000006027312,0.00002320442,0.000001584153,0.00002261667],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9225835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.899843,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3200066318117181,"score_gpt":0.4231084233857723,"score_spread":0.1031017915740542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}