{"id":"W2794988994","doi":"10.47339/ephj.2017.78","title":"Evaluating two methods of testing residual sanitizer concentrations in food service establishments","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BCIT Environmental Public Health Journal","topic":"Food Safety and Hygiene","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"British Columbia Institute of Technology","keywords":"Hand sanitizer; Significant difference; Residual; Environmental science; Sanitation; Pulp and paper industry; Chlorine; Residual volume; Toxicology; Food science; Mathematics; Materials science; Chemistry; Environmental engineering; Medicine; Statistics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008907565,0.0009219645,0.0006170465,0.002028921,0.0004310018,0.001055827,0.001384288,0.001332905,0.001187674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01621781,0.0004601427,0.0006193506,0.001170592,0.000822049,0.00091205,0.001060405,0.0006788762,0.0003976244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001438214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008852872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006415831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01053153,"domain_scores_codex":[0.981084,0.007203191,0.001177218,0.002020112,0.007944745,0.0005706611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977968,0.009240072,0.004171811,0.0006854531,0.007404729,0.0005298125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01307858,0.004521326,0.5376772,0.003615158,0.001171968,0.0002793091,0.004651074,0.002318465,0.2444348,0.0004276144,0.000767009,0.1870573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000485412,0.06913208,0.6864095,0.0002931702,0.0008532069,0.0006649473,0.003091403,0.009690482,0.2253213,0.0001851133,0.003590734,0.0002826324],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9841787,0.001701815,0.01124705,0.0001170557,0.000103338,0.0004836147,0.0003161622,0.00006770891,0.001784527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467177,0.001019123,0.04784523,0.00009661395,0.00005467519,0.0007561821,0.0008130681,0.00002069165,0.002676714],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04710829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3200066318117181,"score_gpt":0.4231084233857723,"score_spread":0.1031017915740542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}