{"id":"W2795011335","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzy045","title":"Team dynamics within quality improvement teams: a scoping review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","topic":"Interprofessional Education and Collaboration","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"The Wilson Centre; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"Team composition; CINAHL; Team effectiveness; Scopus; Context (archaeology); Medicine; MEDLINE; Health care; Task (project management); Psychology; Knowledge management; Medical education; Nursing; Psychological intervention; Computer science; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01246256,0.0005784361,0.002498621,0.0005826991,0.001081916,0.00008628005,0.001135782,0.0006050252,0.0004190127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004365628,0.0004812359,0.0007386608,0.0004724511,0.00007665354,0.0002983638,0.0002378723,0.002449992,0.0001647663],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01364419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03257513,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001093839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00867388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9843444,0.004622824,0.008160149,0.0007011413,0.001386526,0.0007849564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851647,0.001926825,0.007596124,0.0005474486,0.004370934,0.0003939432],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001857345,0.0001740944,0.00009113192,0.491051,0.0001891461,0.00000240451,0.005415002,0.000001145618,5.600732e-8,0.007020075,0.03246328,0.4634069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005160159,0.0001307612,0.000007140316,0.4937114,0.00004434015,0.00001007508,0.006906652,0.000008215002,5.915518e-8,0.0003383143,0.4980216,0.0003054147],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001924581,0.9565715,0.0005175011,0.006179242,0.026297,0.008385053,0.001229406,0.00005673713,0.000744292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000133037,0.9746808,0.001166767,0.01408054,0.003170665,0.002468462,0.002416586,0.00008714596,0.001915768],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4655584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.16424573444956,"score_gpt":0.6473436297903656,"score_spread":0.4830978953408056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}